Critics’ reviews

Elf (2003)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 63: 5 positive, 4 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Elf

63
Positive
5
Mixed
4
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise concentrated on Will Ferrell’s performance rather than the story around him. Critics repeatedly single out his physical comedy, guilelessness and sincerity as the reasons Elf’s seasonal sweetness works as often as it does. The warmer notices also value its old-fashioned charm and good nature, while even several sceptical reviews find Ferrell an engaging presence who carries thin material.

The main divide is over whether that charm compensates for flimsy plotting, uneven pacing and sentiment that some find unearned. Supporting characters draw both praise for the casting and complaints that they have too little to do. The spread is wide: Den of Geek embraces the film’s lasting Christmas appeal and Ferrell’s joyful sincerity, whereas Eye for Film dismisses it as unimaginative and excessively sugary. Between those poles, several reviews enjoy the comedy but remain unconvinced by its emotional payoff.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Jason Caro
80

Caro presents it as a sweet seasonal comedy that relies on Will Ferrell’s performance. He singles out Ferrell’s talents as the film’s central strength.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 November 2023 · Peter Bradshaw
75*

Bradshaw finds the film an enduring, sweet-natured Christmas comedy. He praises its old-fashioned charm, while noting that its softer qualities now stand out more than Ferrell’s manic comedy.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 October 2003 · David Rooney
75*

Rooney finds the comedy sweet-natured and appealing, despite a somewhat stitched-together story. He singles out Ferrell’s exuberant physical comedy and guileless performance as its main source of buoyancy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 November 2003 · A.O. Scott
70*

The review is positive about this warm-hearted holiday comedy. It singles out Will Ferrell’s performance as the film’s chief appeal.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Anna Smith
65*

Smith finds the film amusing, with Ferrell’s physical comedy carrying it despite flimsy plotting. She praises the timing of the gags but faults the ending’s weak emotional impact and sidelined supporting characters.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TJ
65*

The available page does not expose the critic’s overall verdict. Its description singles out Bob Newhart’s framing performance as immediately charming.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
29 October 2003 · John Hazelton
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its paywall hides the critic’s verdict. The accessible text does not reveal anything the critic singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
26 October 2003 · ★★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
50

Gonzalez finds the film underwritten, unevenly paced, and overly predictable. He praises Will Ferrell’s physical comedy, which nearly saves the show.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
4 November 2003 · Scott Tobias
40*

Tobias finds the comedy entertaining but ultimately mediocre, with its unconvincing holiday sentiment undermining the heartwarming ending. He praises Will Ferrell’s performance and the well-chosen supporting cast, while criticizing the film’s pacing and over-eager style.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 December 2012 · David Crow
90*

Crow celebrates the film as an enduring Christmas classic. He especially praises Will Ferrell’s sincere, joyful performance as Buddy.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 December 2003 · Angus Wolfe Murray
10*

The critic dismisses the film as an unimaginative, overly sugary family comedy. They complain that its script avoids difficult issues and singles out Jovie as the only character who behaves as if she lives in the real world.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate