Critics’ reviews

End of Days (1999)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 43: 0 positive, 5 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of End of Days

43
Positive
0
Mixed
5
Negative
4

The reviews lean towards disappointment, though several critics find End of Days entertaining enough as an action film. Praise clusters around Gabriel Byrne’s lively, menacing Satan, whose presence gives even some detractors something to enjoy. The action earns more qualified approval: individual sequences provide excitement, and the more receptive reviews accept the familiar thrills without finding much to distinguish the film from its predecessors.

The divide is between critics who find the silliness tolerable and those who think the borrowed ideas and muddled religious plotting spoil the entertainment. Schwarzenegger’s performance splits opinion directly: Variety welcomes his vulnerability, while Radio Times finds him unconvincing. The harsher reviews describe a solemn, overblown film whose spectacle cannot make the story persuasive or its characters engaging. The spread is substantial, then, but the favourable end amounts to qualified enjoyment rather than strong enthusiasm; the disagreement is chiefly over how much the action compensates for the weaknesses.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Bob McCabe
65*

McCabe finds it an entertaining action film, though it invites unflattering comparisons with Terminator 2 and has clunky moments. He singles out Schwarzenegger doing what he does well, and the comic novelty of seeing him take a beating from Miriam Margolyes.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is visible.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Jason Caro
60

Caro finds the film calculated but fairly enjoyable, despite Schwarzenegger’s unconvincing performance. He singles out Gabriel Byrne’s attention-grabbing portrayal of the Devil for praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
10 December 1999 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the film entertaining but ultimately unexceptional, delivering what viewers would expect without much more. It especially praises Gabriel Byrne’s lively, menacing performance as Satan, noting that the film loses appeal when he gives way to the computer-generated demon.

Read the full review →
Variety
23 November 1999 · Todd McCarthy
50*

McCarthy finds the film an uneven, middling vehicle that mixes exciting moments with excessive religious horror. He praises Schwarzenegger’s vulnerable performance and singles out the subway chase and crash as especially exhilarating.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 December 1999 · Peter Bradshaw
20*

Bradshaw gives the film a sharply mocking, negative verdict. He complains that it borrows wholesale from other films, while singling out Gabriel Byrne’s Satan as fantastically lascivious.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
20*

The critic finds the film solemn, silly and overblown. They fault it as a rehash of earlier apocalypse thrillers.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 November 1999 · Janet Maslin
15*

Maslin dismisses the film as incoherent, derivative, and absurd despite Schwarzenegger’s confident performance. She singles out its muddled religious plot and recycled action-movie parts as major flaws.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
25*

The critic finds the story implausible and the film unexciting despite its spectacle. He singles out the impressive effects and extreme violence as unable to improve the story or build sympathy.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate