Critics’ reviews

Erik the Viking (1989)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 42: 1 positive, 2 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Erik the Viking

42
Positive
1
Mixed
2
Negative
4

Most critics take a dim view of Erik the Viking, with the comedy drawing the most persistent complaints. Praise is limited rather than shared across the reviews: Variety enjoys the premise and finds the Viking crew’s characters the chief attraction. Even the strongly negative Los Angeles Times review finds something to like in John Cleese’s restrained performance, though it notes how briefly he appears. There is little agreement that these strengths sustain the film.

The spread is wide, from an enjoyable comic adventure to a fantasy that offers neither laughs nor excitement. Empire locates the problem in a film caught between comedy adventure and the stranger, Pythonesque humour it never quite achieves. Other reservations concern flat fantasy sequences, poor direction and Tim Robbins’s peace-loving Viking. Two reviews lack accessible text, so their specific judgements cannot be established; the verifiable responses lean firmly negative.

Variety
31 December 1988 · Variety Staff
70*

The review finds the film enjoyable overall, with an amusing premise. It singles out the Viking crew’s wonderful characters as the film’s great strength.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
· Roger Ebert
64*

The page appears to be RogerEbert.com’s review of the 1989 film, but its content is blocked. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
28 October 1989 · Janet Maslin
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the provided text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · John Ferguson
40

Ferguson finds the Nordic spoof sadly wanting. He singles out Tim Robbins’s peace-loving Viking role as one the actor would probably prefer to forget.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Lloyd Bradley
25*

Bradley finds the film caught between comedy adventure and the leftfield lunacy it never fully achieves. He complains that its Pythonesque formula runs out of steam when the off-the-cuff stupidity is too thin.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· WH
20*

The critic calls the film unfunny, poorly directed and unexciting. The review’s central complaint is that the post-Python comedy fails to deliver laughs.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
1 November 1989 · CHRIS WILLMAN
10*

Willman finds the film’s comedy consistently lifeless and its fantasy sequences flat. He singles out John Cleese’s restrained performance as the picture’s best element, despite his brief appearance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate