Critics’ reviews

Escape from New York (1981)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 77: 8 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Escape from New York

77
Positive
8
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics like Escape from New York, and the lean is clearly positive: eight of eleven reviews are favourable and none is hostile. The praise clusters around Kurt Russell’s Snake Plissken, whom several critics call the film’s focal point, and around the ruined New York itself: the production design, the night photography and the synth score come up again and again. Later reviewers find its vision of a broken police state has aged into something close to prophecy, and treat the politics as the main interest.

The reservations are about execution, not the idea. Radio Times and Variety both think the premise outruns what Carpenter does with it, with scenes that miss the drama they set up. Den of Geek flags dated handling of gender and race while still recommending it. The spread is narrow, from lukewarm to warm; the lowest scores come from critics who still find it watchable, and nobody argues it is a bad film, only a rougher one than its reputation suggests.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
90*

Freer calls the film highly entertaining and praises its cool, effective sci-fi setup. He singles out Kurt Russell’s Snake Plissken as the standout, with an unusually compelling mix of anger, coolness and wit.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 December 2003 · ★★★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
88

Gonzalez finds the film’s politics strikingly immediate and its analog-minded subversion resonant. He singles out Snake’s final act and the cassette as a potent expression of analog bringing opposing nations together.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 October 2018 · ★★★★☆ · Phil Hoad
87*

Hoad considers Escape from New York close to Carpenter’s peak, with Snake Plissken giving it a strong focal point. He praises the film’s ramshackle analogue of crime-ridden 1970s New York and its broad, self-aware social satire.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
12 June 1981 · Arthur Knight
80*

Knight gives the film a strongly positive verdict, praising its intriguing premise, effective cast and expert execution. He especially singles out the convincing future-New York setting and its striking production design and photography.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
· Anton Bitel
75*

Bitel views the film as an eerily prescient dystopian thriller that remains compelling. He singles out its bleak vision of a broken police state and its anarchic final gesture.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1980 · Variety Staff
70*

The review calls the film a solidly satisfying actioner, though its execution falls short of its premise. It praises the imaginative, fun special-effects work while faulting some scenes for not reaching their dramatic potential.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TM
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It contains no review text from which to identify what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

Jones finds the film entertaining but says it never delivers on its ingenuity. He praises the marvellous night-time opening sequence.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
90*

The critic finds the restoration invigorating and calls the film a definitive action classic. They single out its atmospheric dystopian world and Kurt Russell’s commanding performance as Snake Plissken.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
20 November 2018 · ★★★★ · Lou Thomas
80

Thomas finds the film remarkably effective and immersive despite dated gender and racial aspects. He particularly praises its atmospheric production design and pulsing synth score.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
14 March 2005 · Max Blinkhorn
65*

Blinkhorn finds the film undeniably watchable and sees it as a cult classic despite its roughness. He singles out the memorable, quirky performances, especially Isaac Hayes as the Duke of New York.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate