Critics’ reviews

Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw (2019)

23 reviews from 23 publications. Critics’ score 65: 14 positive, 7 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw

65
Positive
14
Mixed
7
Negative
2

Most critics find Hobbs & Shaw entertaining despite its familiar plotting and deliberate absurdity. Praise centres on Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham’s comic chemistry, with Vanessa Kirby repeatedly singled out for her wit, presence and physical dexterity. The action also wins broad approval, particularly the London chase and close-quarters fights, while several reviews credit the film with giving its spectacle enough emotional weight to matter.

The main reservations concern repetitive banter, uneven jokes and a running time that stretches thin material. The final act divides opinion: some find it sluggish, while Consequence sees it as the point where the action and emotional stakes become satisfying. The spread runs from enthusiastic approval to outright rejection: The AV Club disputes the praise for the action, calling it poorly staged, while The i Paper finds the film loud and exhausting but still admires Kirby.

Empire
1 August 2019 · Kambole Campbell
80*

Campbell finds the film a thrilling, charming action romp despite jokes that sometimes fall flat. He particularly praises Vanessa Kirby’s wit and dexterity, along with the lead actors’ chemistry.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Jones finds the spin-off audacious, with bursts of awe-inspiring action. He says the leads’ banter can become wearisome between those set pieces.

Read the full review →
Vulture
31 July 2019 · Bilge Ebiri
78*

Ebiri finds the spin-off refreshingly entertaining, thanks to the leads’ chemistry and contrasting energies. He especially praises the tightly choreographed physical action, while noting that some large-scale set pieces feel obligatory.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
31 July 2019 · ★★★/4 · Jake Cole
75

Cole finds the film’s quick-witted leads and family-focused emotional stakes endearing, despite its familiar franchise formula. He praises the stars’ chemistry and the inventive, escalating action sequences.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
31 July 2019 · B- · Eric Kohn
70

Kohn finds the film an uneven but entertaining buddy comedy, with its leads’ chemistry overcoming much of the weak plotting and excess runtime. He especially praises the comic interplay between Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham, while also noting the Samoan finale’s emotional and representational strengths.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
31 July 2019 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw finds the spin-off an unexpectedly fun, fervently silly action romp, though its final battle loses steam. He praises the gonzo action and especially the hair-raising London chase.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
31 July 2019 · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the film an enjoyable, knowingly absurd action spectacle, though its extended final act goes on too long. He particularly praises the lively, humorous banter between Johnson and Statham.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 July 2019 · Peter Debruge
70*

Debruge finds the film fun and highly accomplished despite its wildly over-the-top, nonsensical excesses. He praises David Leitch’s efficient visual storytelling and inventive action set-pieces.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
2 August 2019 · ★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
60

O’Sullivan gives the spin-off a mixed verdict, finding its London action entertaining but its humor uneven. She particularly praises Vanessa Kirby as Hattie, while criticizing the chemistry with Jason Statham.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
1 August 2019 · 3/3/3 · Hannah Strong
60

The critic finds it silly, fun, and ideal summer cinema, though it can overstay its welcome. She praises the bombastic set-pieces and the chemistry between Johnson and Statham.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
1 August 2019 · Justin Chang
60*

Chang finds the spinoff diverting but overlong, with too much snark and not enough soul. He praises Vanessa Kirby as the standout, stealing scenes from Johnson and Statham.

Read the full review →
Time Out
30 July 2019 · ★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
60

The review says the spin-off gets the job done. It singles out the bickering between Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham as a highlight.

Read the full review →
Total Film
31 July 2019 · ★★★ · James Mottram
60

Mottram finds it entertaining but overly familiar, with the constant macho banter and a sagging final act weakening the film. He praises the action, especially the London chase and Statham’s corridor fight.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
31 July 2019 · C · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
57

Vishnevetsky finds the film silly and initially fun, but ultimately far from the series’ best. He praises the early energy and comic interplay of its stars, while faulting the action set pieces as uninspired and poorly staged.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
1 August 2019 · Tim Grierson
35*

The critic finds the fast-paced spin-off underwhelming rather than impressively furious. The headline singles out its lack of the expected fury as a complaint.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
31 July 2019 · ★ · Demetrios Matheou
20

Matheou judges the spin-off a dismal failure, finding it loud, exhausting, and let down by a weak script. He singles out Vanessa Kirby as the film’s highlight, praising her resourceful character and nimble action work.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
2 August 2019 · Miles Surrey
78*

Surrey finds the spinoff a wildly entertaining action film that embraces its superhero-style absurdity. He especially praises David Leitch’s cleanly composed, easy-to-follow action sequences.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
1 August 2019 · 3.5 out of 5 · Don Kaye
77*

Kaye finds the film entertaining despite its familiar plot and over-the-top action. He singles out the comic chemistry between Johnson and Statham as the film’s main strength.

Read the full review →
/Film
31 July 2019 · 6 out of 10 · Hoai-Tran Bui
77*

The critic finds the film excessive and silly, but ultimately pretty fun. She praises the energetic action setpieces and the physical chemistry between Johnson and Statham.

Read the full review →
Consequence
31 July 2019 · Clint Worthington
70*

Worthington finds the film silly and overlong early on, but says its finale brings emotional stakes and satisfying action. He especially praises Vanessa Kirby’s capable, charismatic performance and the Samoan setting’s action sequences.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
31 July 2019 · Gabriella Geisinger
70*

The critic finds the spin-off entertaining, if derivative, and just over-the-top enough to work. She praises its funny, fast-paced action and points to the quieter moments as a welcome contrast to the constant banter.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
31 July 2019
70*

The review finds the film a knowingly silly, frivolous blockbuster that succeeds by pairing spectacle with heart. It particularly praises the imaginative, visually impressive stunts and action sequences.

Read the full review →
Paste
1 August 2019 · 5.6 · Dom Sinacola
58*

Sinacola finds the film entertaining in some respects but ultimately less imaginative and effective than the preceding Fast & Furious films. He praises the cast’s charm, especially Idris Elba’s menace, while criticizing the action for favoring spectacle over visceral execution.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate