Critics’ reviews

First Blood (1982)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 61: 4 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of First Blood

61
Positive
4
Mixed
4
Negative
1
Radio Times
★★★★ · Jason Caro
80

Caro finds the film an involving action drama, unlike its cartoonish sequels. He praises Brian Dennehy’s snarling performance and the tautly assembled woodland chase.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
22 October 1982 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert gives the film a positive review. He singles out Rambo’s wounded character as a strength.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
70*

The critic regards the film as a politically significant, first-rate action thriller, despite some flaws. They especially praise Kotcheff’s tightly paced motorcycle-and-police-car chase and the film’s evocative cinematography.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TM
64*

The accessible page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be determined from the accessible text.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 June 2022 · Peter Bradshaw
55*

Bradshaw finds the film watchable but preposterous, with limited dramatic wit. He praises its old-school action spectacle, especially the explosions and stunt-glass window crashes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 October 1982 · Vincent Canby
50*

The critic’s verdict is mixed. The review’s specific praise or complaint cannot be verified from the inaccessible page.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1981 · Variety Staff
30*

The review is negative, faulting the film for credibility problems and for retreating from its stated social themes. It particularly complains that the film offers no attempt to address the lingering consequences of Vietnam.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
28 August 2008 · ★★★★ · Mark Pickavance
80

The critic calls it an excellent action film with a strong message about the effects of war. He especially praises Stallone’s performance and the supporting work of Brian Dennehy and Richard Crenna, while criticizing the Blu-ray transfer and sparse extras.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 July 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
50*

The DVD is presented as a mixed package, with good picture and sound but little supplementary material. The reviewer praises the widescreen DVD’s colour and sound quality, while noting that its only extra is a trailer.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate