Critics’ reviews

Flash Gordon (1980)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 65: 4 positive, 5 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Flash Gordon

65
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
1

Most critics take Flash Gordon as camp and enjoy it on those terms, and the reviews lean positive without much conviction. The praise clusters around two things: the production design, with its sky castles and gaudy colour, and Max von Sydow’s Emperor Ming, which nearly every critic singles out as the straight-faced performance that holds the silliness together. Queen’s score gets its share of affection too, and several reviews treat the film’s absurdity as the point rather than a fault.

The reservations are consistent. The leads are judged weak, the plot thin and the dialogue clumsy, though most critics count those failings as part of the fun. The Guardian finds the final battle loses momentum. The spread is wide, from Empire’s wholehearted enthusiasm at the top to Variety at the bottom, the lone negative notice, which calls the film gaudy and silly while still admiring von Sydow. Three of the ten reviews are only partly available.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
90*

Smith finds the film an exuberantly entertaining piece of interstellar campery. He especially praises its over-the-top characters, colourful production design and Queen score.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
9 August 2020 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
75*

O'Sullivan finds the film a marvellously terrible romp that remains a blast forty years later. She singles out its absurd pleasures, including Flash's lack of superpowers and the clever wedding vows.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
31 July 2020 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

Bradshaw finds the film a deliriously colorful, bizarre piece of intergalactic entertainment, though it loses momentum in the final battle. He singles out Max von Sydow’s straight-faced performance for keeping the film’s absurdity alive.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CPea
65*

The available excerpt presents the film as a return to baroque, old-fashioned science fiction. It singles out its wedding-cake sky castles, but the page text is unavailable to establish the critic’s overall verdict.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the page provided.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 December 1980
64*

The headline presents the film as a return to simpler days, but the article itself was inaccessible. Its specific verdict and any singled-out praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · David Parkinson
60

Parkinson finds the film great fun if viewers set aside the plot and enjoy its campy performances and effects. He especially praises Max von Sydow’s Emperor Ming, while noting that the weak performances of the leads add to the film’s charm.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1979 · Variety Staff
30*

The review finds the film gaudy and silly, though its badness is part of the fun. It singles out Max von Sydow’s adroit performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
7 March 2009 · Jennie Kermode
70*

Kermode finds it silly but timelessly entertaining, despite weak lead performances. She especially praises Max von Sydow's commanding Emperor Ming.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 August 2010 · Mark Pickavance
65*

Pickavance finds the film a flawed but wonderfully kitsch experience, with its absurdity often becoming entertaining. He especially praises the sumptuous production design, Queen’s soundtrack and Max von Sydow’s performance, while criticizing the dialogue and acting.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate