Critics’ reviews

Floating Weeds (1959)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 73: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Floating Weeds

73
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics respond warmly to Floating Weeds, finding considerable emotional force beneath Ozu’s restrained style. Praise centres on the carefully composed, motionless shots and expressive use of colour, which the reviews connect to the characters’ turmoil and the film’s melancholy. Several accounts also stress its humanity: the camera allows people to speak or remain silent without pressing a judgement upon them. Gentle comedy and the father’s pride in his son help explain why some critics find it so moving.

The spread of assessments is wide, though the readable reviews offer few detailed objections. Empire provides the clearest dissent, judging it one of Ozu’s weaker works while still finding it worthwhile, particularly for its seaside atmosphere and Kazuo Miyagawa’s photography. The two assessments classed as mixed have no readable review text available, so their reservations cannot be established. The disagreement is therefore clearer in the ratings than in the supplied critical arguments.

The New Yorker
1 February 2012 · Richard Brody
85*

Brody offers an appreciative reading of Ozu’s film and its emotional force. He singles out its unusually bright, flamboyant color palette and the turmoil conveyed beneath its restraint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
21 May 2024 · ★★★★ · Jake Cole
80

Cole praises both films as indispensable, while noting the remake’s especially haunting melancholy. He singles out the gradual fading of color as a powerful expression of the troupe’s defeat.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 May 2004 · Keith Phipps
80*

Phipps praises Ozu’s films as humane, quietly absorbing works that benefit from his refined style. He singles out the camera’s generous neutrality for letting characters speak or remain silent without inviting judgment.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
2 August 2003 · Philip French
80*

French gives the film an affirmative assessment, calling it vibrant despite its austere style. He singles out Ozu’s carefully composed, motionless shots and the film’s universal themes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 November 1970
75*

The headline frames the film as a sensitive, elevating work, indicating a positive verdict. It singles out Ozu’s ability to lift the everyday.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
68*

The page appears to be a Great Movies review, but its text is unavailable. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The available page metadata provides no readable critical verdict. It notes the film’s unusual use of colour, but the article text is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
35*

Parkinson considers it one of Ozu’s weaker works, though still worthwhile. He praises its sustained seaside atmosphere and Kazuo Miyagawa’s photography.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
30 November 2012 · ★★★★★ · Alan Bett
100

Bett finds the film deeply moving, with its gentle comedy giving way to emotional force. He praises Ozu’s static compositions and highlights the heartbreak of the father’s pride in his son.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate