Critics’ reviews

Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 77: 9 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Gentlemen Prefer Blondes

77
Positive
9
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics find Gentlemen Prefer Blondes a lively, sharply comic musical, with praise concentrated on Marilyn Monroe and Jane Russell’s double act. The reviews repeatedly single out Monroe’s ironic delivery and screen presence, alongside Russell’s acerbic humour. The musical numbers, choreography, colour and costumes also draw approval, with “Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend” receiving particular attention. The leads’ contrasting performances give the comedy much of its appeal.

The spread runs from enthusiastic to qualified approval, with no outright negative verdicts among the reviews supplied. Reservations concern the story and how much substance sits beneath the entertainment: Empire finds that the plot meanders in Paris, while Variety describes an entertaining but lightweight musical. Time Out offers a more guarded assessment, finding the film flawed but just about successful as naughty Technicolor comedy. The disagreement is chiefly over how much those limitations matter.

The Guardian
25 February 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw calls the film a sparkling, tremendous musical comedy and a joy. He especially praises Monroe and Russell’s fantastic double act and the contrast between their performances.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
1 August 2010 · ★★★½/4 · Christian Blauvelt
88

The review sees the film as a celebration of consumerism that also subverts conventional romantic and sexual mores. It praises Hawks’s portrayal of Lorelei and Dorothy as sexually powerful women who control the screen and the gaze.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
85*

Parkinson finds the film one of the 1950s’ most charming and entertaining musicals. He praises Hawks’s shaping of Monroe’s screen persona and her scene-stealing performance, while noting that the plot meanders in Paris.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
85*

The capsule presents the film as a scintillating, sharply comic musical. It particularly praises Monroe’s ironic performance and Jack Cole’s incisive choreography.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tony Sloman
80

Sloman describes the musical as scintillating and says Monroe shines. He singles out the production numbers, especially “Diamonds Are a Girl’s Best Friend,” for praise.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
80*

The capsule gives the musical an enthusiastic verdict. It singles out the lead performances and praises the sumptuous, ironic numbers and ravishing colour and costumes.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · The Standard
75*

The capsule gives the film a positive verdict, calling it beautifully directed. It singles out Marilyn Monroe’s star-making performance and Jane Russell’s share of the acerbic lines.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Michael Koresky
70*

Koresky argues that the women’s bond ultimately outshines the film’s glamour and riches. The standfirst singles out the connection between Marilyn Monroe and Jane Russell’s characters.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 July 1953 · William Brogdon
70*

Brogdon finds the film a flashy, entertaining, lightweight musical whose pace and escapism should make it a box-office success. He singles out Jane Russell and Marilyn Monroe as its chief assets, praising their comedy, songs, and screen presence.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 July 1953
64*

The page identifies a review, but its verdict cannot be determined from the inaccessible content. No praise or complaint is available to report.

Read the full review →
Time Out
24 February 2010 · ★★★ · David Jenkins
60

The critic finds the film flawed but just about successful as naughty Technicolor comedy. The review singles out its comic treatment of the economic advantages of an ample bosom.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate