Critics’ reviews

Ha-Chan, Shake Your Booty! (2026)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 74: 7 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Ha-Chan, Shake Your Booty!

74
Positive
7
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to the film’s playful treatment of grief and renewal, with seven positive reviews and three mixed. Praise centres on Rinko Kikuchi, whose funny, emotionally grounded performance gives the whimsy a human basis. The dance sequences are another point of agreement: the reviews repeatedly welcome their energy and expressive use of fantasy. Even the more reserved critics find charm and pleasure in the film’s willingness to be odd.

The disagreement concerns how well that oddness serves the story. Some reviews find the tonal shifts graceful; others say the increasingly wacky turns interrupt the emotion or make the darker passages feel punitive. Slant Magazine points to superficial characterisation, while Eye for Film finds that the episodic structure weakens the emotional payoff. Collider is considerably more enthusiastic, valuing the earnestness and simplicity that other reviews find less satisfying. The spread runs from qualified enjoyment to firm affection, with no outright rejection.

The Hollywood Reporter
23 January 2026 · festival review · Caryn James
80*

The critic calls the film a small delight and an unexpected charmer, with an optimistic story of grief and renewal. She praises Rinko Kikuchi’s affecting, funny performance and the graceful shifts into surreal fantasy.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
22 January 2026 · B · Kate Erbland
77

Erbland finds the film’s whimsical approach to grief mostly successful, though increasingly wacky plot turns sometimes disrupt its emotional flow. She praises Rinko Kikuchi’s performance and the film’s effervescent spirit, especially its fantastical dance sequences.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 January 2026 · festival review · Wendy Ide
70*

The review presents the film as charming and playful. It singles out Rinko Kikuchi as a spark in the ballroom dance drama.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
19 September 2026 · ★★½/4 · Kenji Fujishima
62

The review finds the film charming but held back by superficial characterizations. It praises Kikuchi Rinko’s emotionally grounded performance amid the film’s playful surrealism.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
31 January 2026 · festival review · Justin Chang
60*

Chang finds the comedy uneven but enjoyable, with its shifts into darker territory sometimes feeling unnecessarily punitive. He praises Kikuchi’s freewheeling performance and Wladyka’s loopy, expressive dance sequences.

Read the full review →
Collider
3 February 2026 · 9/10 · Taylor Gates
90

Gates calls it a charming, near-perfect surreal rom-com whose earnestness and simplicity make it special. She especially praises Rinko Kikuchi’s emotionally wide-ranging performance and the film’s energetic dance numbers.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
22 January 2026 · festival review
85*

The headline presents the film as an engaging crowd-pleaser. It singles out Rinko Kikuchi’s captivating performance and the film’s playful take on the formula.

Read the full review →
Deadline
23 January 2026 · festival review · Glenn Garner
80*

The critic finds the film a heartfelt, whimsical exploration of grief and renewed connection. Rinko Kikuchi’s emotionally expressive performance and dancing are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
23 January 2026
75*

The critic finds the film quirky but emotionally grounded, with its tonal control keeping it on beat. Rinko Kikuchi’s singular, expressive presence is singled out for balancing the whimsy with Haru’s complicated emotions.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
27 January 2026 · Jeremy Mathews
65*

Mathews finds the film an uneven but ultimately joyful exploration of grief and moving forward. He praises Rinko Kikuchi’s performance and the film’s dance sequences, while noting that its episodic structure weakens the emotional payoff.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate