Hannibal (2001)

Ebert finds the film stylish and engaging, though its grotesque material can be excessive. He singles out the performances as a strength.

McCarthy finds the film engrossing and tantalizing, though less powerful and less consistently compelling than The Silence of the Lambs. He praises Anthony Hopkins’s riveting portrayal of Lecter, while faulting the more mechanical plotting after the story leaves Florence.

The visible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It provides no praise or complaint because the review text is behind a paywall.

The page is identifiable as a review of the film, but its text is inaccessible. The critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

The available page identifies this as a review, but provides no accessible critical verdict. Its standfirst introduces Lecter as a sophisticated cannibalistic serial killer, without revealing what the critic praises or faults.

The review presents the sequel as a tongue-in-cheek continuation, with Julianne Moore giving a creditable performance as Clarice Starling. It notes the production’s troubled path to the screen and Anthony Hopkins’s playful return as Lecter.

The review finds Hannibal disappointing as a sequel but entertaining as an adaptation of the novel. It praises Anthony Hopkins’s performance while faulting the film for lacking suspense and a strong narrative thrust.

Brooks finds the film a bloated, tensionless disappointment that turns Lecter into a parody of his former self. He briefly praises the Florence scenes for sparking to life, but says Moore is underused and the film’s gore and camp overwhelm its drama.

Nathan finds the sequel inert, dull and a disappointing use of its central character. He faults its lack of atmosphere and thrills, while noting that Liotta and Oldman have fun in their roles.

The critic finds Hannibal interesting but overly self-indulgent, and weaker than Silence or Red Dragon. They praise its attractive visuals and Hopkins’s performance, while faulting the mediocre script and slow pacing.

The critic sees the sequel as a failure, with implausible story details undermining it despite Ridley Scott’s polished style. Julianne Moore’s performance is singled out for praise, while Anthony Hopkins’s Lecter is described as oddly comic.