Critics’ reviews

Her Private Hell (2026)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 39: 4 positive, 1 mixed, 10 negative.

Back to our review of Her Private Hell

39
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
10

Most critics do not like it, and those who do like it for the reasons the rest do not. Ten of fifteen reviews are negative, and the complaint that recurs is style over substance. Where there is agreement it is on Pino Donaggio’s score, which several reviews call the one thing holding the film together, and on the neon-lit sets, which nearly everyone concedes are handsome even with nothing behind them. Kristine Froseth and Charles Melton are each picked out once as bright spots in otherwise mannered acting.

The reservations cluster on plot, or the lack of one, and on stilted dialogue delivered at a glacial pace. Several critics accuse Refn of recycling his own motifs; Collider goes further and finds the treatment of the women openly misogynistic. The spread is wide, from ten to seventy-five, and the dissenters, Deadline and The Ringer among them, argue that the incoherence is the point and the film should be taken as spectacle or not at all.

The Guardian
19 May 2026 · festival review
75*

The critic describes Refn’s film as a bizarre, shapeshifting fantasia and midnight movie of dreamy disquiet that eludes definition as it moves between doomy reality and strange dream worlds. They single out its hypnotic strangeness and slow, sepulchral pace executed with quasi-Lynchian characters in neon-lit settings.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
23 July 2026 · Amy Nicholson
70*

The critic describes it as an expressionistic sci-fi fantasy with cryptic babes, stagy fables of lust and rivalry, and hazy plotting that defies logic. Refn's commitment to his style is admired, with Kristine Froseth singled out as the scene-stealing comic sexpot.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
20 May 2026 · C · Jason Gorber
57

The critic calls the film a moody, messy dud that favors style over substance and fails to be either exceptional or truly egregious. The score stands out as the one element providing some romantic and chromatic relief amid the artificiality and meandering plot.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
20 May 2026 · ★★ · James Mottram
40

The critic calls it an endurance test and Marmite movie that is sexy and stylish in its hellscape textures and violent set pieces but ultimately pretentious, laborious and lacking plot or tension.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
19 May 2026 · festival review
30*

The critic finds the film intermittently enrapturing in its sensual visuals, sex and violence but largely frustrating, with stilted dialogue and a vacuousness that becomes its principal feature.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
21 May 2026 · festival review
30*

The critic describes Refn returning with a fantastical metropolis story heavy on violent eye-gouging, neon visuals and orchestral score, but hampered by wafer-thin characterisation and an emphasis on style over substance.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 July 2026 · Jeannette Catsoulis
30*

The critic finds the film a ponderous, neon-soaked fairy tale with a laughable plot and stylized performances, best appreciated as a surreal spoof of Refn himself. The lush score by Pino Donaggio serves as the movie's lifeline amid mannered and phlegmatic direction.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 July 2026 · ★/4
25

The review praises the film as a hypnotic, neon-tinged sci-fi thriller that suggests Inland Empire for the influencer set, with strong filmmaking and overripe dialogue in its wild climax. It singles out the transcendental method in Refn’s trashy madness as potentially moving for some viewers.

Read the full review →
Variety
19 May 2026 · festival review · Owen Gleiberman
20*

The critic calls the film a David Lynch-on-bad-acid disaster with no coherent story, just models posing and snarling amid lavish sets and a gorgeous score. Refn is faulted for recycling motifs into pretentious art-trash that announces itself as too cool to cohere.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
20 July 2026 · Ryan Lattanzio
10*

The review describes the film as a ghastly, miserable endurance test that despises its audience, with actors delivering lines at a glacial pace in a neon-drowned setting. It singles out the overall theatrical viewing experience as one of the most unpleasant in years.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
19 May 2026 · festival review
10*

The critic finds the film numbing and self-indulgent, calling it an agonizing return marked by excessive style over substance. The futuristic, neon-drenched setting and horror-thriller elements are singled out as overly fetishistic and dull.

Read the full review →
Deadline
18 May 2026 · festival review · Damon Wise
75*

The critic finds it a bold, trippy return to feature filmmaking that divides viewers and demands they take a side. He singles out Pino Donaggio’s phenomenal score as the secret sauce that guides the film and gives it emotional context.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
24 July 2026 · Adam Nayman
75*

The critic embraces the film's full-throttle, unhinged Refn style—its fetishistic visuals, score, lighting, and genre signifiers—as a hypnotic, self-indulgent spectacle worth experiencing even without narrative coherence. He singles out the atmospheric, tactile interiors and structural parallels among father figures for praise amid the camp miasma.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
19 May 2026 · D- · Rafa Sales Ross
30

The critic finds the film a hollow, derivative imitation of Refn's previous work, lacking energy and emotional depth despite its neon visuals and stylistic nods. They single out Charles Melton's performance as the film's only saving grace amid otherwise listless acting and aimless storytelling.

Read the full review →
Collider
20 May 2026 · festival review · Therese Lacson
25*

The critic finds the film visually gorgeous in its cyberpunk aesthetic but ultimately empty and lifeless, with stilted dialogue and mechanical storytelling. She singles out the misogynistic male gaze, shallow female characters reduced to daddy issues and sexual exploitation, and lack of substance or horror-thriller elements despite the talent involved.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate