Critics’ reviews

Hercules (1997)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 77: 9 positive, 4 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Hercules

77
Positive
9
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Most critics like Hercules, and the praise clusters in two places. The first is Gerald Scarfe’s angular, caricatured designs, which several reviewers call the freshest thing Disney animation had attempted in years. The second is James Woods’ fast-talking Hades, named as the chief attraction for adults by nearly every review that discusses the voice cast. David Zippel’s lyrics, the gospel chorus and the brisk handling by directors John Musker and Ron Clements also draw warm words.

The reservations are about tone. The mixed reviews find the film cheeky rather than funny, working too hard to amuse grown-ups and leaning on gags that assume some classical knowledge. The Independent argues the anachronisms make the myth accessible at the cost of its weight, and Empire calls it noisy and relentless where it should be charming. Collider ranks it lowest among Musker and Clements’ films. Nobody dislikes it outright; the spread runs from admiring to lukewarm, and the later retrospectives divide much as the reviews of the time did.

Vulture
25 July 2014
91*

The critic calls the 1997 Disney animated film an underrated masterpiece and their favorite Disney movie, praising its blend of hero story and rom-com elements along with a standout soundtrack.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 June 1997 · Kenneth Turan
90*

This free-spirited show-biz version of Greek mythology ranks with the best of modern Disney animation. The critic singles out the snappy musical patter by David Zippel, the wisecracking aura combined with romantic poignancy, and the deft mix of comic tone with traditional Disney life lessons.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 June 1997 · Janet Maslin
90*

The ingenious new animated Hercules is pretty divine, with Disney animation back in top form. The critic singles out the inspired intuition bringing together ancient lore, gospel singing, girl-group choreography, and free-floating mischief into a jubilant pastiche, plus wild visual ideas from production design by Gerald Scarfe.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 June 1997 · Leonard Klady
90*

Hercules displays the muscle and charm to dominate family and kid biz for the season as a winning tall tale, cleverly told and wonderfully voiced. The critic singles out the forceful and amusing melding of character animation with the screen personae of the actors voicing the roles, particularly Danny DeVito and James Woods, plus the vitality and insouciance from directors John Musker and Ron Clements.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 April 2014 · TJ
89*

The critic praises the film as another benchmark achievement by the Aladdin team of Musker and Clements, noting its infectious humour that appeals across ages and the great craft in Gerald Scarfe's angular visual design. They single out the likeable but dim-witted grown-up Herc, James Woods' cigar-chomping Hades as the chief attraction for adults, and the gospelling divas of the chorus.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
16 August 2022 · Carlos Aguilar
80*

The critic argues that the 1997 Disney animated film, despite underperforming at the box office, was a key creative success in the studio's 1990s renaissance with enduring strengths in its reimagining of Greek myth.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
27 June 1997 · Roger Ebert
79*

The film is lighter, brighter, and more cheerful than the previous year's Hunchback of Notre Dame, with more for kids to identify with. The critic singles out the fresh visual style from Gerald Scarfe's caricatures and the witty in-jokes and satire mixed with broad entertainment for children.

Read the full review →
The Independent
9 October 1997
60*

The critic finds the film cheeky rather than genuinely funny and notes that its anachronisms and product placements make Greek mythology accessible but come at the cost of gravitas. The animation mixes styles effectively with distinctive Gerald Scarfe designs, and the modern relevance of the themes is a strength.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Andrew Collins
50*

The review notes that the film falls into the 'New Disney' category of being noisy, intellectual and relentless rather than charming, with a by-the-numbers feel despite springy drawings and fulsome songs. It works too hard for grown-ups and requires classical knowledge for its gags.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
23 November 2016 · Simon Brew
79*

The piece reflects positively on the 1997 Disney animated film Hercules as an underappreciated entry in the studio's renaissance era, noting its box office performance and lasting affection among fans. It singles out the voice casting process, particularly the successful choice of James Woods as Hades after other high-profile options fell through, as a highlight of the production.

Read the full review →
/Film
10 September 2019 · Josh Spiegel
77*

The critic views the film as a charming but slightly diminished follow-up to Aladdin, with time having been kind to its quirky Gerald Scarfe-inspired animation and strong voice work despite some contemporary criticism of its look and tone. The one element singled out for praise is James Woods' energetic, improvisational performance as Hades, which stands out as the film's highlight.

Read the full review →
Paste
12 June 2024 · Jesse Hassenger
64*

In a retrospective on late-90s Disney animation, the critic groups Hercules with other post-Aladdin efforts that replicate its style of dashing heroes, contemporary sidekicks, and Broadway songs in myth/legend settings. No specific verdict on the film itself beyond contextualizing it in the era's output.

Read the full review →
Collider
26 July 2023 · Tyler B. Searle
50*

The critic ranks it lowest among Musker/Clements films, calling it a stepping-stone project whose overdone story mixes sports and superhero tropes with celebrity satire. They single out the stylistic animation and James Woods' iconic Hades performance as reasons it still has fans.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate