Critics’ reviews

Hotel Transylvania (2012)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 49: 2 positive, 3 mixed, 7 negative.

Back to our review of Hotel Transylvania

49
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
7

Most critics are unimpressed: seven of the twelve reviews are negative, three mixed, and only two come down in its favour. Where the praise gathers, it gathers on the animation. Reviewers across the spread admire Tartakovsky’s stretchy, expressive character work, the retro-pop look of the monsters and the sheer speed of the sight gags, and several concede that enough of the jokes land to pass the time.

The complaints are about everything underneath the drawing. The overprotective-father story is called hackneyed, the sentiment treacly, the script muddled, and more than one critic finds the frantic pace exhausting rather than funny; Empire adds the auto-tuned songs to the charge sheet. The scores sit tightly around the low 40s, which makes the dissent stand out: The Wrap calls it a boisterous all-ages treat, and Vulture, writing six years on, finds it a thin but reliably funny diversion. Nobody argues it has much to say about its monsters.

Vulture
25 July 2018 · Bilge Ebiri
70*

Ebiri finds the film thin but entertaining, with its repetitive humor landing often enough to make it a funny diversion. He particularly praises the quick animation and the recurring monster gags.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
7 September 2012 · Brent Simon
64*

The page identifies this as a review of the 2012 film, but its text is behind a paywall. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint are not visible.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 September 2012 · ★★/4 · Abhimanyu Das
50

The critic finds the film weighed down by treacly sentiment, moralizing, and a weak screenplay. They praise the visual inventiveness and energetic retro-pop animation of its monster characters.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
12 October 2012 · ★★ · The Standard
40

The critic gives the film two stars, finding its storyline badly botched despite some decent jokes. They praise its good looks and sustained Gothic spectacle, but complain that scenes feel like unrelated trailers.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Alan Jones
40

Jones gives the film a negative verdict, saying it adds little to a hackneyed overprotective-dad story. He criticizes its often overbearingly exaggerated style.

Read the full review →
Time Out
7 October 2012 · ★★ · Tom Huddleston
40

The review finds the film’s sweetness overbearing. It complains that Adam Sandler’s saccharine side overwhelms his sharper, funnier qualities.

Read the full review →
Empire
17 February 2010 · Helen O'Hara
30*

O'Hara finds the film mediocre, with a generic story that its cast cannot rescue. She praises Tartakovsky's commitment to squash-and-stretch animation, but faults the unfunny jokes and auto-tuned songs.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
27 September 2012 · Alonso Duralde
85*

The critic calls the film a boisterous joyride and a rare all-ages treat. They single out its rapid-fire gags, sight gags, and comic rapport among the performers.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
25 September 2012
50*

The headline presents the film as an energetic Halloween treat, but says it lacks character. It singles out the chaotic energy as a strength and weak characterization as the main complaint.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
24 September 2012 · ★★ · Michael Leader
40

The critic finds the film hollow and exhausting, with little to say about its classic monsters. They praise the expressive animation and visual flair, but say these cannot compensate for the muddled script and weak plot.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
8 October 2012 · ★★ · Simon Reynolds
40

Reynolds finds the film charming in places but ultimately predictable and less witty than stronger animated films. He praises its quaintly retro animation style, while faulting the frequent misfires in its jokes.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 October 2012 · Donald Munro
40*

Munro finds the film a mixed-up mess that tries to do too many things without doing any particularly well. He praises its visual humour and occasional wit, but says the frenetic pace and lack of focus overshadow those strengths.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate