Critics’ reviews

Ice Age (2002)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 61: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Ice Age

61
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
3

Most critics find Ice Age an entertaining animated comedy, with praise clustering around its humour, character relationships and physical set pieces. The warmer reviews appreciate the balance of sentiment and sardonic banter, alongside convincing voice performances and clearly defined personalities, particularly Manny. Scrat’s persistent pursuit of his acorn draws approval even from some detractors, making those sequences the clearest point of agreement across an otherwise divided set of reviews.

The spread is wide: six reviews are positive, two mixed and three negative. Reservations centre on a familiar story, limited inventiveness and dialogue that some find witty but others find wearing. The animation also divides opinion, attracting praise for vivid detail and criticism for its cold, angular look. The Los Angeles Times finds the formula and glibness tiring despite the visual invention, while Eye for Film considers the recurring acorn gag funnier than anything in the main plot.

Total Film
22 March 2002 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review is strongly positive, calling the film a pacy, wild adventure that works beautifully. It singles out Scrat as a scene-stealer, while noting that occasional sentimentality does not spoil the film.

Read the full review →
Variety
15 March 2002 · Joe Leydon
78*

Leydon expects the film to appeal to audiences of all ages and praises its entertaining, funny story. He especially singles out the vivid computer animation and the convincing voice performances.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
75*

Freer finds the film likable and entertaining, despite its lesser inventiveness compared with Toy Story and Shrek. He singles out the sharply defined character relationships and especially the big-hearted, world-weary Manny for praise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
15 March 2002 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert regards the film as an entertaining animated comedy. He singles out its humor and engaging characters as strengths.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 October 2002 · Rob Mackie
75*

Mackie finds the film an engaging, warmly entertaining alternative in the cartoon wars. He praises its blend of sentiment and sardonic humor, especially the confidently staged set pieces and visual details.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 November 2002 · ★★★½ · Ed Gonzalez
70

Gonzalez finds the film less evocative than a Pixar wonderland but ultimately hard to resist. He especially praises Scrat’s visually minimalist, persistent acorn chase as a scene-stealer.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
10 March 2002 · John Hazelton
64*

The accessible page identifies this as Screen’s review, but its verdict is hidden behind the paywall. No specific element praised or criticized is available in the visible text.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Sloan Freer
60

Freer finds the film witty but held back by a basic story with too little action and excitement. The banter between the lead characters is a strength, while the animation’s cold, angular style is hard to warm to.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 March 2002 · Kenneth Turan
30*

Turan finds the film’s formulaic story and relentlessly glib dialogue tiring, despite its visual inventiveness. He especially praises Scrat’s slapstick antics and the film’s physical-adventure sequences.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· WH
30*

The review finds the film less inventive than Pixar’s work. It criticizes the animation’s lack of visual surprise and the characters’ uninflected anthropomorphism.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 March 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
25*

The review finds the film’s script and adventure underwhelming. It praises the recurring acorn gag as funnier than anything in the main plot.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate