Critics’ reviews

In the Realm of the Senses (1976)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 69: 6 positive, 5 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of In the Realm of the Senses

69
Positive
6
Mixed
5
Negative
1

Most critics take the film seriously and lean positive. The praise gathers around Ōshima’s direction: the careful camerawork that keeps the couple’s sexual exploration disturbing rather than titillating, the exquisite composition, and a claustrophobic, almost ritual handling of erotic obsession. Several reviews treat it as a study of consuming desire and note that the sex scenes grow more complex as the relationship turns desperate. More than one critic admits the hardcore content makes a level-headed judgement harder than it should be.

The reservations cluster on the same material. The Independent finds it difficult and often grim while admiring the artistry, and Eye for Film concedes the repetition may drive some viewers away. The lone negative review, in The Skinny, calls it tedious, says the shock wears off quickly, and argues the endless sex scenes and misogynistic fantasies leave no room for story or character. Three of the twelve reviews are only partly readable, which thins the middle of the spread.

Empire
29 July 2009 · David Parkinson
80*

The critic calls the film powerful, stylish and impressive, while noting its disturbing subject matter. They praise its sensuality and sensitivity alongside its documentary-like portrayal of the lovers’ increasingly desperate relationship.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Parkinson presents the film as a complex study of gender, status and oppression. He notes that its hardcore eroticism can obstruct a considered assessment.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
27 April 2009 · ★★★★ · Eric Henderson
80

Henderson praises the film’s deliberate, provocative treatment of sexuality and its artistic ambitions. He especially applauds Criterion’s restoration, which brings out natural skin tones and vivid colors.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
27 May 2009 · Scott Tobias
75*

Tobias finds both films keenly observant studies of consuming desire and its consequences. He singles out the complexity and progression of the sex scenes in In The Realm Of The Senses.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 November 2000
75*

The critic regards the film as a powerful, unusually serious classic that everyone should see once. They praise its claustrophobic, ritualistic portrayal of erotic obsession and self-abasement.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
65*

The critic finds the film still fresh, despite its abrasive qualities. The grittiness is singled out as making viewers wince well before the infamous climax.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
festival review · Tony Rayns
64*

The page identifies this as Tony Rayns's review, but the review's verdict is not visible. No specific praise or complaint can be established from the available text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 July 1977
64*

The headline signals a review, but the article text is inaccessible, so its verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 March 2012
64*

The available page text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its description singles out the film’s explicit sex scenes and their impact when it was released.

Read the full review →
The Independent
4 November 2011 · Ben Walsh
55*

The critic finds the film difficult and often grim, but ultimately admires its artistry. The exquisite composition is singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
18 October 2011 · David Graham
80*

Graham regards the film as a powerful, haunting work of transgressive cinema, though its explicitness and repetitive perversity may alienate some viewers. He praises Ōshima’s careful camerawork for making the couple’s sexual exploration disturbing without turning it into titillation.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
24 October 2011 · ★★ · Scott McKellar
40

The critic finds the film tedious and says its shock value fades quickly. He singles out the endless sex scenes and misogynistic fantasies as crowding out any meaningful story or character development.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate