Critics’ reviews

It Ends (2026)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 74: 11 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of It Ends

74
Positive
11
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics like It Ends, and the praise clusters in two places: the premise and the cast. Reviewers keep returning to the economy of Alexander Ullom’s set-up, a group of young people on a road that never ends, and to how much dread it wrings from so little money. The unknown actors are singled out again and again, for their chemistry and for the way the script establishes them through ordinary banter before things turn. Several critics read the film as a portrait of post-college futility and take that seriously.

The reservations are about what happens once the idea is in place. The AV Club and The Hollywood Reporter both find it repetitive, the premise stretched past what it can carry, and Time Out wonders whether it would have suited a short. IndieWire, warmer, still thinks the journey lacks a destination. The spread is wide, from the year’s-best enthusiasm of The Guardian to a middling C, with no outright pans.

Los Angeles Times
19 August 2026 · Amy Nicholson
90*

This inventive and inspiring microbudget debut marks a standout for young directors with its otherworldly endless-road premise. It singles out the cast of unknowns and the philosophical exploration of living a meaningful life for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 August 2026
90*

The critic calls the micro-budget horror gripping and ranks it among the year’s best films. They single out the stellar performances by the gen-Z cast and the expertly crafted sense of dread in its time-loop premise.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
21 August 2026 · Peyton Robinson
80*

The debut is a troubling yet honest surrealist psychological drama that confidently stakes its value in living as a radical act amid Gen-Z existential anxiety. It singles out the screenplay's blend of funny banter and dreadful exchanges for praise.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
20 August 2026 · B- · Esther Zuckerman
70

The critic calls the film a promising but underdeveloped indie horror movie that cleverly sets up an existential Gen Z riff on Sartre with unnerving moments, yet ultimately disappoints as the journey lacks a satisfying destination.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 August 2026 · Chris Barsanti
70*

The critic describes the film as a neatly crafted if somewhat under-imagined inquiry into a Twilight Zone scenario with tight worldbuilding and philosophical undertones, but notes it falls short of being mind-blowing due to underdeveloped characters and human elements.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 March 2025 · festival review · Siddhant Adlakha
70*

The brilliant existential road thriller for and by Gen Z is a streamlined low-budget genre piece whose pulpy flourishes reveal something more tonally surprising. It singles out the quick, economical character establishment through banal conversation for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
19 August 2026 · ★★★ · Elizabeth Weitzman
60

The film is an existential metaphor about young people trapped in a looping road with no exit, using zombies as a minor element in a non-traditional horror. It can be a tough, repetitive watch that might suit a short better, but the unknown actors bring depth to their characters and the visuals are strong.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 August 2026 · C · Monica Castillo
57

The critic praises the strong, terror-inducing premise of the liminal road trip horror but finds the film runs out of gas as the monotony wears thin, turning into a bloated Twilight Zone episode that stretches its limited scope too far.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
7 March 2025 · festival review · Jordan Mintzer
50*

The critic finds the debut feature a well-crafted conceptual horror film with strong direction and pacing that sustains tension in a limited setting, but notes it becomes repetitive and fails to fully develop its characters or payoff once the premise is established.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
14 March 2025 · A- · Chase Hutchinson
90

The critic finds it a fascinating, effectively haunting debut that marks the director as one to watch, giving life to the dread of young adulthood through its existential nightmare on an unending road, praising its well-shot, written, and acted qualities especially for a first feature.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
18 August 2026 · David Crow
85*

The critic praises the film's clever, economical premise of a never-ending road trip into cosmic horror, highlighting its inventive use of limited resources and strong character dynamics. They note it effectively blends horror with existential themes and leaves a lingering impact.

Read the full review →
Collider
25 March 2025 · festival review · Matthew Donato
80*

The critic finds the film a winning experiment in existential road-trip horror that thrives on ambiguity and the characters' shared anxieties about post-college life. The small ensemble's chemistry and the film's focus on impermanence over conventional scares are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
/Film
21 August 2026 · 8/10 · BJ Colangelo
80

The critic praises the film's meditation on existential angst and the bleak endless journey of adulthood, singling out its compelling execution of a simple thought experiment grounded in recognizable reality.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
20 August 2026
80*

The critic views Alexander Ullom’s debut as a vital, unnerving horror film that captures a generation’s sense of futility through its central metaphor of an endless road from which the characters cannot escape. It singles out the film’s profound simplicity in exploring themes of meaninglessness, whether one should keep going or give up, as its most powerful element.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate