Critics’ reviews

John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum (2019)

22 reviews from 22 publications. Critics’ score 76: 17 positive, 5 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of John Wick: Chapter 3 - Parabellum

76
Positive
17
Mixed
5
Negative
0

Most critics like it, and they like it for the same reason: the fighting. Nearly every review singles out the action choreography and Chad Stahelski’s staging, with the antiques-shop knife fight, the glass-walled offices, the horses and the dogs named as the set pieces that earn the ticket. Keanu Reeves is generally credited with holding it together, tired-looking and sincere. Several reviews also welcome the expanded mythology, though mostly as a bonus rather than the draw.

The reservations cluster around length and repetition. Variety and Collider find the mayhem hollow without stakes or character to attach it to; The Times feels the film-makers run out of puff by the final act, and The Independent finds the violence one-note. The Casablanca stretch with Halle Berry divides opinion: The Guardian calls it the weakest section while Radio Times enjoys it. The spread is narrow, with no outright negative reviews; the sharpest dissent comes from The New Yorker, which finds the extended fights numbing.

The Guardian
18 May 2019 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The third instalment overwhelms with opulent martial arts set pieces and a riotous, relentless aesthetic of hi-tech baroque spectacle. It makes an art of pain in a curiously life-affirming way, though the Casablanca segment with Halle Berry is the weakest.

Read the full review →
Empire
10 May 2019 · Nick de Semlyen
85*

The review lauds the gloriously raucous entry that deepens the mythology and delivers inventive, wince-inducing action sequences, singling out the magnificently orchestrated dust-ups and confident world-building for praise while noting the self-serious tone enhances the fun.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
17 May 2019 · Matthew Norman
80*

The review praises the film as massively entertaining for viewers with a high tolerance for stylised lethal force, highlighting Chad Stahelski’s kinetic direction that turns gruesome action into something fluid and almost beautiful, along with Keanu Reeves’ gravitas.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
1 May 2019 · Michael Sragow
80*

The critic praises the sustained hyperbole, dark whimsy, and Chad Stahelski's direction of the action sequences, noting that Reeves convinces viewers Wick is worth rooting for through his mix of agility, shrewdness, and sincerity.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
16 May 2019 · 4/4/3 · Matt Thrift
80

Praises the film's astonishing action set-pieces and staging while noting it remains a solid franchise entry despite being the longest and somewhat bloated by digressions.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
15 May 2019 · Jen Yamato
80*

The critic notes the film bursts with sleek and squishy top-notch action and winking humor that breaks the characters out of genre bounds. She singles out the sublimely inventive close-quarters fights with the lethally graceful Reeves for praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Finds the nonstop kinetic fights and over-the-top gun battles inventive and engaging, singling out Halle Berry's cameo and the dogs for praise while noting the finale slightly over-extends.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
10 May 2019 · John DeFore
80*

The critic praises the film as an epic of choreographed mayhem that expands the Wickiverse in mostly pleasing ways, destined to satisfy fans of the franchise. They single out the inventive, thrilling action sequences such as the antiques store knife fight and the glass offices showdown.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
16 May 2019 · ★★★★ · Adam Sweeting
80

The critic calls the action cranked to melting point and praises the blindingly simple set-up as part of the allure, noting that Wick fans will adore this third instalment that keeps the thrills coming over its long runtime.

Read the full review →
Time Out
9 May 2019 · ★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
80

Celebrates the rigorously conceived and coherent action sequences as the highlight, calling the film a fever dream of an action movie that is gloriously dumb but remarkably well-staged.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 May 2019 · Jeannette Catsoulis
70*

The critic describes the film as a symphony of dazzlingly sterile, cartoonish abuse with guns having more dialogue than the hero. She singles out the staggeringly accomplished fight choreography for praise while noting the minimal time spent on other elements like the High Table headquarters.

Read the full review →
Variety
10 May 2019 · Andrew Barker
65*

The critic calls it unquestionably great action filmmaking on a level of pure craft, the most technically accomplished of the series. He singles out the diminishing returns from watching two-plus hours of mayhem without palpable dramatic stakes or emotion.

Read the full review →
The Independent
16 May 2019
60*

The critic finds the film stylish and inventive in its action but notes that the relentless, stylised violence risks monotony and that it remains a one-note exercise with little nuance or characterisation beyond the set pieces.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
17 May 2019 · Richard Brody
60*

The critic finds the extended fight scenes range from numbing to repellent, succeeding less as martial-arts spectacle than as a post-apocalyptic political drama. He singles out the remarkable overarching conceit that leaves a chill despite evacuated particulars.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
16 May 2019 · ★★★
60

The sequel pushes Reeves and the premise to the limit with bravura long-take choreography and meaty set pieces every reel, standing comparison with The Raid 2, though the saga has ballooned in scale.

Read the full review →
The Times
18 May 2019
60*

The combat scenes are stupendous in ridiculous locations, with the best of them showcasing printed books as weapons; enjoyed more than Chapter 2 but still brain-numbing at times, with the film makers running out of puff by the final act.

Read the full review →
/Film
10 May 2019 · 9/10 · Chris Evangelista
90

The critic hails it as an action masterpiece that ups the stakes with jaw-dropping sequences and strong world-building, noting the playful humor and Reeves's tired but compelling performance. The verdict is that each new entry improves on the last and viewers will be ready for more.

Read the full review →
NME
28 May 2019 · Alex Flood
85*

The critic describes the film as exhilarating and exhausting in equal measure and calls it the best chapter in the franchise, praising the top-notch performances, especially from the female cast, and Stahelski's mastery of combat scenes.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
16 May 2019 · ★★★★ · Richard Jordan
80

The review calls the film an absolute riot for fans, highlighting its breathless pacing, jaw-dropping stunts, and strong new characters like Zero, while noting a few stumbles with Wick's superhuman elements.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
3 January 2020 · Jennie Kermode
80*

The critic praises the film's relentlessly inventive and realistic fight choreography and stunning stunt work with dogs, calling the editing and cinematography top-notch. The verdict is that it is strictly for action fans but very good at what it does, remaining watchable despite little plot.

Read the full review →
Collider
16 May 2019 · B · Matt Goldberg
77

The critic praises the jaw-dropping stunt work and action set pieces but finds the film hollow because it fails to connect the action meaningfully to story or character development.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
15 May 2019
70*

The critic finds the film a mostly enjoyable threequel that delivers slick, gonzo action sequences, though the franchise strain is starting to show. They single out the inventive and thrilling action choreography, particularly the knife fight and horse kicks.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate