Critics’ reviews

Johnny English (2003)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 56: 1 positive, 6 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Johnny English

56
Positive
1
Mixed
6
Negative
3

The reviews lean towards mixed, with Rowan Atkinson’s comic skills drawing more consistent praise than the material he is given. Critics find intermittent laughs in his physical comedy and familiar bumbling, though enthusiasm for the spy spoof as a whole is limited. Empire offers the warmest response, praising the crowd-pleasing set-pieces and an impressive car chase. Variety also finds an effective family romp, crediting Atkinson’s character-based comedy while acknowledging the script’s lack of polish.

Reservations cluster around predictability, repetition and a premise that promises more than it delivers. The spread runs from cheerful acceptance of familiar silliness to frustration at how little the script supplies beyond slapstick. John Malkovich’s villain earns praise for comic timing and camp amusement in some reviews, but is judged underused elsewhere. Eye for Film takes the strongest negative position, finding the film mostly unfunny and its central character unsympathetic, while still appreciating Natalie Imbruglia and Malkovich.

Empire
1 January 2011 · Caroline Westbrook
75*

Westbrook finds the film entertaining and crowd-pleasing despite its lowbrow, familiar comedy. She especially praises the funny set-pieces, singling out an impressive car chase.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 April 2003 · Derek Elley
65*

Elley finds the film an extremely silly but effective family romp, though its script lacks polish and older audiences may find little new. He praises Rowan Atkinson’s character-based comedy, especially the audience’s ability to stay one step ahead of Johnny English.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DA
64*

The page identifies this as a film review, but the critic’s verdict is unavailable in the provided content. The visible description introduces the villain’s anti-British ambition but does not reveal what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 July 2003
63*

The page is identified as a review of Johnny English, but its text is inaccessible. The available headline characterizes its spy as bumbling; the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be confirmed.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 July 2003 · Nathan Rabin
60*

Rabin finds the spy spoof mildly amusing but generally meek, and says its premise promises more than the film delivers. He singles out Rowan Atkinson’s physical comedy, especially during the lively climax, as making the limited material work.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 July 2003 · ★★/4 · Nick Schager
50

Schager finds the comedy largely repetitive and the film too fixated on Atkinson’s slapstick. He says Atkinson’s physical antics occasionally get a laugh, while Malkovich’s French-accented villain is reduced to a sideshow.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Sloan Freer
40

The review finds the comedy unassuming rather than especially distinctive. It singles out Atkinson’s reliance on facial tics, pratfalls and schoolboy humour.

Read the full review →
Total Film
11 April 2003 · ★★ · Total Film
40

The critic finds the film hopelessly predictable, despite a handful of laughs. They single out Atkinson’s familiar bumbling and Malkovich’s camp performance as occasional sources of amusement.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
9 April 2003 · Angus Wolfe Murray
30*

The critic finds the film mostly unfunny, blaming a repetitive script and an unsympathetic central character. They praise Natalie Imbruglia’s personality and John Malkovich’s comic timing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate