Critics’ reviews

Jules and Jim (1962)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 85: 9 positive, 0 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Jules and Jim

85
Positive
9
Mixed
0
Negative
0

Not one of the nine reviews comes down against Truffaut’s film, and most place it near the top of their scale. The praise gathers in two places. The first is Jeanne Moreau, whose Catherine most critics treat as the reason the film still holds: volatile, free, and hard to look away from. The second is the filmmaking itself, with the camerawork and editing singled out repeatedly for their energy and invention. Several reviews also credit the three leads together for making the triangle work.

The reservations are modest and scattered rather than shared. Slant Magazine finds the character writing thin in places and the ending hastily staged, and The Guardian, while otherwise admiring, has doubts about how the film sees Catherine and the men who orbit her. Variety, writing on release, calls it occasionally uneven. The two earliest reviews are also the coolest; the spread is narrow, and the film’s standing has, if anything, risen since.

Time Out
27 May 2008 · ★★★★★ · Nina Caplan
100

The five-star rating indicates an enthusiastic verdict. The accessible metadata does not reveal what the critic specifically praises.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2014 · David Parkinson
90*

Parkinson praises the film as a glorious, humane summation of New Wave ideas. He singles out Jeanne Moreau’s Catherine and Truffaut’s inventive use of images and editing.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
2 February 2022 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw regards Truffaut’s film as a whirlwind masterpiece, while questioning its portrayal of Catherine and the men around her. He singles out Jeanne Moreau’s performance and her delicate singing of “Le Tourbillon de la Vie.”

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
30 May 2005 · ★★★½/4 · Chuck Rudolph
88

Rudolph considers the film an essential, enduring work despite shortcomings in its character writing and hastily staged ending. He particularly praises Truffaut’s expressive camerawork and the film’s generous, emotionally resonant details.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
85*

The critic sees the film as a dazzling, emotionally free account of love. They single out Truffaut’s technical virtuosity and the impeccable performances of the three leads.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1961 · Variety Staff
75*

The review finds the film candid and tender overall, though sometimes uneven. It praises Truffaut’s light touch in evoking moods, time, place, and desire.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 April 1962 · Bosley Crowther
70*

The review is broadly positive about Truffaut’s film. It singles out the film’s treatment of the relationships among its three central characters.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
20 September 2002 · Amber Wilkinson
80*

Wilkinson finds the film a joyful, thoughtful challenge to conventional ideas of morality. She especially praises Jeanne Moreau’s portrayal of Catherine and the way the three leads bring the love triangle to life.

Read the full review →
The Skinny
28 July 2014 · ★★★★ · Lewis Porteous
80

The review praises the film’s youthful energy and calls it a work certain to captivate audiences. It singles out Jeanne Moreau’s volatile beauty and sense of empowerment as making the biggest impression.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate