The reviews split down the middle, leaning slightly warm. Most critics agree that director J.A. Bayona is the film’s main asset, bringing gothic horror and a surer hand with set pieces than the previous entry managed; the volcanic eruption and the Indoraptor stalking a mansion draw most of the praise. Several call it an improvement on Jurassic World, and a few note better work from the leads, Bryce Dallas Howard in particular.
The reservations gather around the script. Critics find the human plot slight, predictable and heavy with exposition, and several complain that the second half shrinks into a haunted-house chase after a large-scale opening. The spread is wide, from a firm recommendation at Deadline to a handful who think the franchise itself is worn out: IndieWire and The Wrap find the spectacle stale and say a new director cannot rescue it. Even sympathetic reviews admit the film spends much of its time setting up the next one.
E
Empire
5 June 2018 · Ben Travis
70*
The critic praises director J.A. Bayona for injecting gothic horror tension and big-scale set pieces into the series, particularly the volcanic eruption sequence and Indoraptor scares, while noting improved character work for the leads.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
7 June 2018 · Kim Newman
70*
With J.A. Bayona directing, the dinosaurs finally leave the island for an enjoyably sinister new setting in a spooky old house, bringing gothic glee and actual villains who are satisfyingly dispatched. The family-friendly franchise tone occasionally cramps the director's style, but the change of locale and focus on villains marks a welcome shift.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
5 June 2018 · John DeFore
70*
The critic finds this a stronger entry than the prior film, with Bayona bringing classic monster-movie energy and treating the dinosaurs more like characters while shifting much of the action into a spooky mansion setting. He praises the visuals, pacing, and thrills but notes some old-fashioned handling of the female lead.
Read the full review →The critic notes franchise fatigue in the first half but highlights strong set-pieces in the second, especially the volcano sequence and the Indoraptor's gothic mansion scares, crediting Bayona for bringing soul to the dinosaurs.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
5 June 2018 · ★★★ · Huw Fullerton
60
The film is a fun romp with unusual new ideas, pleasant characters like newcomer Maisie, and plenty of dinosaur action, bolstered by strong set pieces from director J.A. Bayona. However, it functions more as a stepping stone to set up the next film, leaving this entry feeling slight and unsatisfying despite its ambitions.
Read the full review →The film follows Owen and Claire as they attempt to rescue dinosaurs from a volcanic island, but human villains feel minor. Bayona delivers one standout suspense sequence with a child and a giant claw, though the franchise's demands limit him.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
5 June 2018 · Justin Chang
50*
It is an improvement over the prior entry thanks to Bayona’s confident direction of destruction and horror scenes, but remains ho-hum and predictable overall. The move of dinosaurs to the mainland and some adjustments to characters provide minor pleasures, yet the series fails to evolve meaningfully.
Read the full review →V
Variety
5 June 2018 · Owen Gleiberman
50*
It is the first entry to pretend to be more than a ride by incorporating topical conspiracy elements, but the dinosaur action still rules though not enough; Bayona keeps it moving competently but the script weighs it down into a so-so ride.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
10 June 2018 · Peter Bradshaw
45*
The film is merely serviceable despite some genre flourishes and a gothic mansion set piece. The critic singles out its overlong, video game-like scenarios and on-the-nose political satire for complaint.
Read the full review →T
The Times
10 June 2018 · ★★ · Tom Shone
40
The sequel starts strong but gets smaller, with the volcano as the best performer and a finale reduced to a mano-a-dino chase. The critic complains about the halting plot and gothic trimmings that fail to elevate the material.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
20 June 2018 · Matthew Norman
30*
The critic finds the film an improvement over its predecessor but still calls the franchise irretrievably dull, criticising the hackneyed script, lack of tension, and absence of humour while noting some effective dinosaur empathy shots.
Read the full review →The review criticizes the film as formulaic and ludicrous in its CGI dinosaur elements, arguing that the franchise's repetitive approach to spectacle and plot has worn thin despite the new director and setting shifts.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
18 June 2018 · Pete Hammond
80*
The critic finds the dinosaurs still hard to resist after 25 years, praising how director J.A. Bayona spreads the mayhem more intelligently than in prior entries. The action sequences once the dinosaurs are unleashed are described as top notch and entertaining.
Read the full review →C
Collider
21 June 2018 · B · Haleigh Foutch
77
The critic praises director J.A. Bayona for bringing back awe, wonder, and horror elements to the franchise through strong visuals and set pieces, while also noting improved performances especially from Bryce Dallas Howard. The film is seen as a fun, pulpy, and absurd evolution of the series despite some logic issues and heavy CGI.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
5 June 2018 · ★★★ · Matt Edwards
60
The film takes the franchise in a slightly different direction with strong action set pieces and striking visuals from director Bayona, though the story feels slight and the dinosaurs lack scale.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
22 June 2018 · Matt Chapman
60*
The blockbuster shifts from explosive action to a haunted house/slasher tone in the second half, which slows the pace and feels repetitive, resulting in an enjoyable but less biting franchise entry.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
20 June 2018 · Matt Patches
55*
The critic finds the action sequences and Bayona's direction exciting and pulpy, especially the dinosaur-focused set pieces and kaiju-style moments, but criticizes the script's overreliance on human drama, twists, and exposition that drag down the fun. Overall, it falls short of its potential as a silly blockbuster due to the human elements.
Read the full review →/
/Film
20 June 2018 · 4/10 · Josh Spiegel
40
The critic finds the film knows the notes but not the music of the original Jurassic Park, with stupid characters and poor script choices throughout. Bayona's direction of the mansion action sequences is praised as an improvement over the prior entry.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
22 June 2018 · Dan Callahan
30*
The critic faults the film for treating its action and suspense sequences without enthusiasm, rendering even iconic hiding-from-dinosaurs moments hackneyed and expected. The overall result is a dull sequel that drains the excitement from the dinosaur premise.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate