Critics’ reviews

K-PAX (2001)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 53: 1 positive, 7 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of K-PAX

53
Positive
1
Mixed
7
Negative
4

The reviews lean towards mixed: K-PAX attracts praise for its performances and visual craft, but less confidence in its storytelling. Kevin Spacey and Jeff Bridges provide the central appeal for several critics, who find their exchanges engaging even when the surrounding drama falters. Iain Softley’s restrained direction also earns approval, while Variety singles out his compositions and John Mathieson’s use of light. The mystery offers an intriguing starting point for much of the discussion.

The main reservation is that the film struggles to sustain that intrigue, with complaints about derivative plotting, an underwritten home-life subplot and an unsatisfying conclusion. The spread is wide, particularly over its ambiguity and Spacey’s performance. Eye for Film finds the uncertainty thoughtful and rewarding, praising both leads; Slant Magazine rejects the film’s sentimentality about mental illness and finds Spacey especially poor. Between those poles, most critics see worthwhile elements without finding the whole convincing.

Los Angeles Times
26 October 2001 · Kenneth Turan
65*

Turan finds the film an honorable, engaging entertainment whose story ultimately tries too hard to preserve both sides of its mystery. He praises the performances of Kevin Spacey and Jeff Bridges, while criticizing the conclusion as too glib and pat.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
25 October 2001 · Emanuel Levy
64*

The available page identifies this as a review, but the critic’s verdict is not visible. No specific praise or complaint can be determined from the accessible text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 October 2001
64*

The URL identifies this as a film review, but the article text is inaccessible. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its text is unavailable. No verdict or specific praise or complaint can be established from the accessible material.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
26 October 2001 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert’s verdict is mixed, finding the film intriguing but ultimately unsatisfying. He singles out the uncertainty around Prot’s identity as an engaging idea that the story does not fully resolve.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
60*

Errigo finds the film charming and humane, but says its mix of genres and attempt to embrace competing explanations make it difficult to sell. She particularly praises the performances, restrained direction, and cinematography, while faulting the underwritten home-life subplot.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 April 2002 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the film entertaining and thought-provoking but too derivative to leave a lasting impression. It praises the striking visuals and the first half’s accumulating intrigue, while faulting the story for fizzling out.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Andrew Collins
40

Collins says the strong performances cannot overcome a story that collapses once doubt about Prot’s origins takes hold. He singles out the prospect of Kevin Spacey and Jeff Bridges facing off as a delicious one.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 September 2002 · Rob Mackie
40*

The critic finds the film admirable in parts but ultimately not gripping enough. They praise the interplay between Kevin Spacey and Jeff Bridges, along with Iain Softley’s subtle direction.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 October 2001 · Robert Koehler
40*

Koehler finds the film visually enchanting but narratively disappointing, as it retreats from its intriguing sci-fi premise into familiar psychological drama. He especially praises Iain Softley’s striking compositions and John Mathieson’s use of light, while finding Jeff Bridges’s performance more compelling than Kevin Spacey’s mannerisms.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
18 October 2001 · Ed Gonzalez
10*

The critic dismisses the film as manipulative, unsophisticated Hollywood drivel. They single out Kevin Spacey’s performance as especially poor and criticize the film’s sentimental portrayal of mental illness.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 April 2009 · Stephen Carty
80*

Carty finds K-PAX a refreshing, thoughtful film whose ambiguity makes it especially rewarding for viewers open to existential questions. He particularly praises Kevin Spacey and Jeff Bridges, whose performances give the story its engaging central dynamic.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate