Critics’ reviews

Kundun (1997)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 59: 3 positive, 4 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Kundun

59
Positive
3
Mixed
4
Negative
3

The reviews of Kundun are mixed, with praise clustering around its images and music rather than its storytelling. Roger Deakins’s photography and Philip Glass’s score draw admiration even from critics who find the drama unpersuasive. Several reviews also praise the production design or performances. The broad agreement is that Scorsese creates a richly detailed film; there is much less agreement about how much it reveals about the Dalai Lama.

Reservations centre on a simplistic, episodic script, emotional distance and a reverence that limits scrutiny of its subject. The spread is wide: Slant Magazine reads the impressionistic editing as a way into the Dalai Lama’s inner turmoil, where less persuaded critics find him underdeveloped. Notably, Keith Phipps supplies two sharply different assessments: at The AV Club he finds the approach detached and aimless; at The Ringer he praises the dreamlike imagery and the portrayal of a leader whose understanding of political events is limited.

Slant Magazine
28 October 2019 · ★★★★½ · Jake Cole
90

Cole argues that Kundun is an underappreciated, standout entry in Scorsese’s work. He praises its impressionistic editing, which conveys the Dalai Lama’s inner turmoil beneath his outward calm.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
70*

Freer finds the film difficult and demanding but ultimately thrilling, while noting it falls short of Scorsese’s highest standards. He praises Philip Glass’s score and the haunting beauty of the richly textured images.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 December 1997
65*

The page identifies this as a film review, but its text is unavailable. The critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaints cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The page presents the film as an unusually simple and strange Scorsese work. It characterizes the film as an act of self-imposed exile, but the available text gives no further verdict or specific praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
3 April 1998 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds Kundun ambitious and reasonably absorbing, but weighed down by storytelling problems. It praises the visual splendour and performances, while faulting the simplistic script and episodic narrative.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 December 1997 · Emanuel Levy
50*

Levy finds the film hypnotic and visually stunning but ultimately not compelling or illuminating. He praises Roger Deakins’ imagery and Philip Glass’ score, while faulting the routine screenplay and commonplace dialogue.

Read the full review →
The Independent
4 April 1998 · Matthew Sweet
35*

The critic finds Kundun visually impressive but ultimately too reverential, with its critical edge giving way to hagiography. He singles out the exquisite production design and Roger Deakins’s photography for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
30*

Phipps finds the film ultimately unsuccessful, despite its heartfelt intentions, because its detached, aimless approach leaves the Dalai Lama underdeveloped. He praises the visually stunning moments and the mystery of the opening scene, but says the film cannot sustain that beauty.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
18 October 2023 · Keith Phipps
85*

Phipps argues that Kundun is a major, essential work in Scorsese’s filmography. He especially praises its dreamlike imagery and the way it conveys the Dalai Lama’s limited understanding of political events.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
40*

The critic finds the film visually impressive but ultimately hampered by limited scope and a lack of objectivity. The review praises the look of the film and the amateur cast’s acting, while faulting the dream sequences and the portrayal of Tibetans speaking pidgin American.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate