Critics’ reviews

Kung Fu Hustle (2004)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 75: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Kung Fu Hustle

75
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics come away delighted. The reviews describe a manic, inventive action-comedy, and the praise clusters on Stephen Chow’s imagination: his comic timing, his slapstick, and fight scenes that more than one reviewer describes as a cartoon come to life. Critics repeatedly admire how the film mixes computer effects with practical martial-arts traditions, and how it plays with Hong Kong cinema history alongside Hollywood and Looney Tunes. A few also find it unexpectedly sweet beneath the cartoon violence.

The reservations gather around the story. Several reviewers admit the plot is hard to follow or comes apart after the halfway point, though most treat that as a small price for the set pieces. The spread is wide rather than even: enthusiasm at one end and a single firm rejection at the other. Variety, writing from a festival, finds the film emotionally flat and says the effects-heavy action stands in for character and human drama. Nobody else shares that complaint.

The AV Club
14 October 2010 · Scott Tobias
90*

Tobias gives the film an enthusiastic verdict, calling it a manic and exhilarating action-comedy. He especially praises how Chow combines CGI with practical martial-arts traditions to create a distinctive live-action cartoon.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 October 2005 · Rob Mackie
88*

Mackie finds the film a deliriously inventive delight, despite plots that can be hard to follow. He singles out Chow’s wild imagination, comic timing and gravity-defying action for praise.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Simon Crook
85*

Crook gives the film an enthusiastic verdict, calling it invigorating, bombastic and very funny. He especially praises its inventive, absurd fight scenes and slapstick energy.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
8 April 2005 · Carina Chocano
85*

The critic finds the film lively, witty, and surprisingly sweet despite its extreme cartoonish violence. She praises its brilliantly choreographed action and playful mix of Hong Kong cinema, Hollywood, and Looney Tunes influences.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Karen Krizanovich
80

The critic gives the film a positive assessment. They single out Chow’s distinctive, kung-fu-infused comic style and the film’s impressive martial-arts action.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
11 February 2005 · ★★★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
75

Gonzalez praises the film’s social perspective and goofy, inventive humor, even as its plot falls apart after the halfway point. He singles out the humor’s playful elegance and the way its pop-cultural references illuminate social roles and collective camaraderie.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
66*

The page is a browser-check screen, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No praise or complaint is available in the returned content.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 September 2004 · Allan Hunter
65*

The review’s verdict is not visible in the accessible page. Its praise or criticism is likewise unavailable because the review text is behind a registration prompt.

Read the full review →
Variety
19 September 2004 · festival review · Derek Elley
30*

The critic finds the film emotionally flat and ultimately uninspired, with its prospects weakened by the loss of Stephen Chow’s familiar comic style. He singles out the effects-heavy action as a substitute for character development and human drama.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
25 June 2005 · Keith Hennessey Brown
85*

The critic considers it an achievement and an honest, highly entertaining crowd-pleaser, despite its thin narrative and stylized action. He praises the film’s energetic set pieces and its playful engagement with Hong Kong cinema history.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate