Critics’ reviews

Kung Fu Panda 3 (2016)

18 reviews from 18 publications. Critics’ score 70: 10 positive, 8 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Kung Fu Panda 3

70
Positive
10
Mixed
8
Negative
0

Most critics find Kung Fu Panda 3 a cheerful, appealing sequel, with praise clustering around the animation rather than the story. The reviews repeatedly admire its inventive visual design, colourful settings and fluid fight choreography. Several also welcome the lighter humour and family warmth, while Jack Black’s vocal charm draws praise even from less persuaded critics. The more enthusiastic notices find Po’s story satisfying and the film’s appeal broad enough to include adults as well as children.

Reservations centre on familiarity, thin drama and supporting characters left with too little to do. Some critics find the storytelling confident and well balanced; others see repetition or a middle section that needs tightening. Den of Geek offers a sharper dissent, finding the plot overcomplicated and the emotion lacking despite Black’s efforts. The spread runs from enthusiasm to mixed approval, with the visuals earning more consistent support than the writing.

Empire
7 March 2016 · Olly Richards
90*

Richards finds it a grand farewell and says it may be the series’ best entry. He praises the confident, cheerful storytelling, its steady laughs and gorgeous production design.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 January 2016 · Justin Chang
85*

Chang finds the third installment delightful, saying it restores the franchise’s lightness while bringing Po’s story to a satisfying finish. He especially praises its buoyant humor and visually adventurous animation.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
27 January 2016 · Charles Solomon
80*

Solomon finds the film a satisfying conclusion to Po’s story and a welcome showcase for DreamWorks’ artists. He particularly praises the imaginative animation, visual design, and Chinese-painting-inspired backgrounds.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
28 January 2016 · Gary Goldstein
80*

Goldstein finds the sequel charming, funny and well-constructed, with plenty to please children and adults. He particularly praises the vivid animation and colorful settings, while noting that the pacing could be tighter in the middle.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
11 March 2016 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
75*

O’Sullivan finds the film sweet, savvy and emotionally warming, though not as strong as Toy Story’s conclusion. She especially praises its gorgeous, imaginative action sequences and female characters who avoid simpering.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
25 January 2016 · ★★★/4 · Sam C. Mac
75

The review finds the film familiar but well balanced and charming. It praises the fluidly animated fight choreography and the way action is distributed throughout.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 January 2016 · Michael Rechtshaffen
70*

The critic finds the film generally pleasing, though its storyline falls short dramatically. The luminous visuals and the voice cast are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
16 January 2016 · Tim Grierson
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its verdict is inaccessible. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the available text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 January 2016
64*

The supplied page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
11 March 2016 · 3/3/3 · Joel Philpott
60

The critic finds it decent, generic fun that follows the franchise’s established formula. They praise the precise, graceful animation of its energetic fight scenes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

Jones finds the third chapter affable but repetitive, with too many familiar characters sidelined. He praises its inventive, dazzling visuals.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 March 2016 · ★★★ · Alex Needham
60

Needham finds the sequel impressive and likely to charm both children and adults. He praises its intimate family moments alongside its spectacular set pieces and sumptuous visuals.

Read the full review →
Time Out
29 January 2016 · ★★★ · Anna King
60

The critic describes this as a lighter entry in the successful series. They praise its good looks.

Read the full review →
Deadline
29 January 2016 · Pete Hammond
90*

Hammond calls it the best film in the franchise so far, praising its heart and broad family appeal. He singles out Jack Black’s vocal performance and Bryan Cranston’s dimensional turn as Po’s father.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
16 January 2016
75*

The critic finds the film charming and effervescent, though not groundbreaking. They single out its witty screenplay, colorful visuals, and satisfying reconciliation between Po’s fathers.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
70*

The critic finds the sequel worthwhile and says it retains Po’s appealing underdog quality. They praise its vibrant visuals and atmosphere, but fault Kai for lacking menace.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 January 2016 · 2.5 out of 5 · Don Kaye
53*

Kaye finds the film visually gorgeous but a rote, overcomplicated installment that lacks emotional resonance. He praises Jack Black’s charm and inventive line delivery, while noting that the supporting cast gets little to do.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
4 March 2016 · Angus Wolfe Murray
50*

The critic finds the film sentimental and visually imaginative, but feels its star-studded vocal cast is given too little to say. The 3-D and slow-motion sequences are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate