Critics’ reviews

La Dolce Vita (1960)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 83: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of La Dolce Vita

83
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to La Dolce Vita, with praise centred on Fellini’s satire of celebrity, decadence and social hypocrisy. The reviews repeatedly single out Marcello Mastroianni’s performance, while the dreamlike imagery and black-and-white cinematography receive broad approval. Nino Rota’s score is another strength, and several accounts emphasise how familiar the film’s treatment of fame and the paparazzi remains. The prevailing view is of a film whose excitement coexists with melancholy and disgust.

The reservations concern length and structure rather than the performances or visual craft. Variety suggests that the running time tests some viewers while absorbing others. Eye for Film finds the film overlong and scattered, yet still admires its attack on celebrity and social decay. The available verdicts therefore range from enthusiastic praise to qualified admiration, with no outright rejection; even the more reserved accounts identify substantial strengths.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Parkinson presents the film as a scathing satire of Italian decadence and Catholic hypocrisy. He praises Mastroianni’s performance and singles out the memorable Trevi Fountain encounter with Anita Ekberg.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 September 2024 · ★★★★★ · David Fear
100

The five-star rating signals an enthusiastic verdict. The page highlights the film’s striking images, including Anita Ekberg at the Trevi Fountain and the flying statue of Jesus.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 January 2020 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw regards the film as a brilliant, surreal masterpiece that captures the excitement and melancholy of postwar Rome. He especially praises Fellini’s dreamlike imagery and the ending’s sudden shift from night to morning.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
85*

Parkinson praises the film as a masterpiece that has aged remarkably well. He especially singles out Fellini’s sharp satire of celebrity culture and the paparazzi.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
10 April 1992 · Kevin Thomas
80*

Thomas calls the film an arguably great, enduring work whose portrait of celebrity culture has grown more familiar over time. He especially praises its haunting Nino Rota score, ravishing black-and-white cinematography, and memorable episodes.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1959 · Variety Staff
75*

The review suggests the film’s length may test some viewers, but others will be absorbed throughout. It praises the uniformly strong performances, especially Marcello Mastroianni and Yvonne Furneaux, along with the cinematography and score.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
· Roger Ebert
65*

The page content was blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint is available from the page text.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
27 November 2006 · Angus Wolfe Murray
65*

The critic finds the film too long and scattered, but ultimately regards Fellini’s attack on celebrity and social decay as a triumph. Mastroianni’s performance is singled out as a major strength.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate