Critics’ reviews

Lethal Weapon 2 (1989)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 65: 4 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Lethal Weapon 2

65
Positive
4
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards qualified approval, with praise clustering around Mel Gibson and Danny Glover’s rapport. Their convincing bond helps both the comedy and the action, and even less enthusiastic critics regard their shared charisma as a strength. The more positive reviews also credit the script’s pace and humour, finding enough energy and involvement to make the sequel entertaining rather than merely busy.

The spread is moderate, but the critics disagree sharply over how well the comedy sits alongside the violence. Variety finds the tone more consistent than in the first film, while Radio Times objects to an uneven script and an awkward mixture of laughs and brutality. The Los Angeles Times offers the clearest dissent, acknowledging professional craftsmanship but finding the result hollow and overblown. Reservations elsewhere include weak supporting performances, though these generally qualify the praise rather than overturn it.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Anne Thompson
75*

Thompson finds the sequel exhilarating and unusually engaging for its genre. She praises the twisting script for sustaining the action while deepening the bond between the two cops.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1988 · Variety Staff
75*

The review finds the sequel more tonally consistent and entertaining than the first film. It especially praises the humor and the onscreen rapport between Mel Gibson and Danny Glover.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The review text is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CM
65*

The available text gives no clear overall verdict. It singles out the high-speed chase, explosive crash and helicopter rescue as action highlights.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
7 July 1989 · Janet Maslin
64*

The review’s verdict cannot be determined from the accessible page. Its specific praise or criticism is likewise unavailable.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

Jones calls it the weakest entry in the cop series, criticizing its inconsistent script and awkward mix of comedy and violence. He praises the continuing rapport between Mel Gibson and Danny Glover, and finds Joe Pesci entertaining.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
7 July 1989 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
40*

Wilmington finds the film professionally made and likely to please its audience, but criticizes it as a hollow, overblown action sequel. He praises Gibson and Glover’s charisma together, which he sees as the strongest part of the film.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
15 November 2010 · Mark Oakley
75*

Oakley considers the sequel one of Hollywood’s finest, praising its fast-paced, witty script and the leads’ convincing bond. He faults the supporting performances, especially Patsy Kensit’s, but says the action and direction keep the film entertaining.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
16 February 2010 · Stephen Carty
75*

The critic calls it a solid, entertaining sequel, though it is less effective than the first film. They praise the chemistry between Gibson and Glover, which makes the action and comedy engaging.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate