Critics’ reviews

Little Big Man (1970)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 60: 2 positive, 4 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Little Big Man

60
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
1

The reviews lean towards a mixed response to Little Big Man, with praise for its ambition and performances rather than agreement that its approach works throughout. The favourable accounts find an entertaining, sly tragicomedy that challenges Western myths through Jack Crabb’s perspective. Acting draws the clearest praise: Dustin Hoffman is a strength, while Chief Dan George earns particular appreciation for his dignity and philosophical contributions.

Reservations concern pacing, caricature and the fit between broad comedy and historical suffering. Some encounters drag even for admirers, and Variety sees promise in the mixture of burlesque and serious sketches without offering an enthusiastic endorsement. The New Yorker supplies the sharpest dissent, arguing that the move towards solemn political messaging weakens both the humour and the film’s larger ambitions. The spread is wide, though two inaccessible review texts limit how fully the reasons behind the scores can be compared.

Radio Times
★★★★ · David Parkinson
80

Parkinson regards the film as an ambitious, sly and handsome tragicomedy, though some encounters drag. He particularly praises Chief Dan George’s dignified performance.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
70*

Newman finds the Western entertaining despite its caricatured, exaggerated approach. He singles out Dustin Hoffman’s performance as a particular strength.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
67*

The review presents the film as an epic post-Western seeking to demythologize its subject. It singles out Jack Crabb’s perspective as the lens for that approach.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 December 1970 · Vincent Canby
65*

The article appears to be a review of the film, but its critical verdict and specific praise or complaints cannot be verified from the inaccessible page.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The review text was unavailable, so its verdict cannot be established. The accessible page showed only a browser-check message, with no praise or complaint to assess.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1969 · Variety Staff
50*

The review finds the film’s mix of burlesque and serious sketches an ambitious, potentially worthwhile way to approach historical wrongs. It singles out Chief Dan George’s philosophical contributions as outstanding.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
18 December 1970 · Pauline Kael
25*

Kael finds the film disappointing, arguing that its shift from shaggy comedy to solemn political messaging undermines both its humor and its epic ambitions. She singles out the snow massacre as its one visually effective sequence, while faulting the film for cheapening its impact afterward.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate