Madagascar (2005)

Hazelton finds the film entertaining for children and amusing enough for parents. He singles out its eye-catching look, drawing on Tex Avery slapstick and Henri Rousseau-inspired imagery.

The page could not be accessed, so the critic's verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied text.

Schager finds the film a modest improvement over earlier DreamWorks animation but says it lacks Pixar’s blend of humor and poignancy. He praises its bright, angular aesthetic and lively depiction of New York City.

Thomas finds the film amiable and spirited but says it falls short of its premise and the standard set by Shrek. He praises its visual inventiveness, musical moments and memorable penguins, while faulting its slapstick and stalled storytelling.

The critic calls it serviceable family entertainment, though not on a par with Shrek. They praise its engaging mishaps but say the pace drags in the final third.

Mackie finds the film colourful and enjoyable but muddled and not especially memorable. He praises the early zoo scenes and the imaginative effects of a tranquilliser dart, while criticizing the convoluted plot and a tired parody.

The review gives a mixed-to-negative verdict, finding the film less lively than its premise promises. It singles out its lack of distinctive humor compared with other animated comedies.

The review appears critical, suggesting the promising concept does not work in execution. It singles out the computer-generated setting and character concept, though the full review is unavailable.

The critic finds it lightweight family fun that entertains children but may disappoint adults expecting sharper humour. They praise the impressive animation and single out the penguins and lemurs as especially enjoyable.

The critic finds the film uneven and poorly served by its lead characters. They praise the animation and single out the lemurs and their comic antics as its saving graces.