Critics’ reviews

Make Way for Tomorrow (1937)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 85: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Make Way for Tomorrow

85
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Make Way for Tomorrow, with praise centred on the emotional force of an elderly couple’s separation under family and economic pressure. The strongest notices find that feeling earned, stressing the unsentimental treatment of the couple and McCarey’s careful handling of family dynamics. Intimate performances, precise dialogue and small visual cues make everyday awkwardness affecting without requiring broad villains or easy blame.

The available verdicts range from wholehearted admiration to qualified approval, with reservations about performance and occasional overstatement rather than the central dilemma. The AV Club finds some overemphasis on infirmity and self-pity, though these complaints sit within a strongly positive assessment. Variety is cooler, praising Beulah Bondi’s character work but finding Victor Moore less convincing in a serious role. The RogerEbert.com verdict is unavailable, so its recorded score cannot establish a further point of disagreement.

Slant Magazine
8 July 2004 · ★★★★/4 · Keith Uhlich
100

The critic regards the film as profoundly moving, with its emotional force fully earned rather than manipulative. He especially praises McCarey’s nuanced staging of family dynamics and the intimate performances.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 February 2010 · ★★★★★
100

The review calls the film a Depression-era masterpiece that makes dry eyes impossible. It singles out the elderly couple’s forced separation by economic and family circumstances.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 March 2010 · A- · Noel Murray
90

Murray praises the film as a deeply poignant, finely observed melodrama, despite occasional overemphasis on the characters’ infirmity and self-pity. He singles out McCarey’s precise dialogue and sly visual cues for making its everyday awkwardness and gestures so affecting.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 November 2010 · Philip French
90*

Philip French presents the film as a masterpiece and an enduringly moving drama. He singles out its final evening in New York as unforgettable.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
21 February 2010 · Dave Kehr
90*

Kehr treats the film as a deeply affecting classic. Its unsentimental portrayal of an elderly couple separated by their children is its central strength.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic's verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the supplied page.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1936 · Variety Staff
60*

The review finds the film a simply told tear-jerker aimed at female audiences, with its central dilemma holding interest. It singles out Beulah Bondi’s character work as especially effective, while finding Victor Moore less convincing in the serious role.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate