Maurice (1987)

Thomas calls the film well-nigh flawless and a remarkably faithful, perceptive adaptation. He especially praises James Wilby’s unaffected performance and the graceful script’s treatment of Maurice’s self-discovery.

Tomalin finds the film a subtle, intelligent, moving success that would have pleased Forster. She especially praises James Wilby’s performance and the film’s fidelity to the novel’s mixture of joy and pain.

Bradshaw calls the film a revelation whose fascination and power have only grown over time. He praises the emotionally charged scene where Alec confronts Maurice in London and their hurt feelings emerge.

The review calls the film one of Merchant Ivory’s finest. It praises its rich atmosphere and patient attention to repressed passions.

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is available from the blocked content.

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.

The page identifies this as Time Out’s review of the 1987 film. The available metadata gives no critical verdict or specific praise or complaint.

The review is measured rather than wholly enthusiastic, suggesting the adaptation handles its subject matter gingerly. It singles out the film’s cautious treatment of homosexuality as a weakness.

The review finds the film well-crafted but not among Forster’s best work, and says James Wilby’s performance is adequate rather than exceptional. It praises the supporting cast, especially for outshining Wilby.

Kermode finds the film a moving, intelligent landmark that remains relevant. She especially praises Ivory’s unusually explicit, beautiful portrayal of male bodies.

The critic finds the film an enduring, unabashedly pro-gay romance that has improved with age. Hugh Grant and James Wilby are singled out for convincing performances.