Critics’ reviews

Meet the Fockers (2004)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 48: 2 positive, 4 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Meet the Fockers

48
Positive
2
Mixed
4
Negative
5

The consensus on Meet the Fockers leans towards disappointment, though most critics find something to enjoy in the performances. Dustin Hoffman attracts the most consistent praise for his energy and good-natured mischief, while Barbra Streisand earns credit for making broad comedy feel relaxed. Even several unfavourable reviews find that the pair provide welcome amusement. The recurring distinction is between a cast that can still raise laughs and material that gives them too little fresh work to do.

The reviews differ sharply on how far those performances carry the sequel. Total Film finds an entertaining comedy, particularly in Hoffman’s chemistry with Robert De Niro; The AV Club sees a lazy retread that wastes its cast. Reservations centre on recycled humiliation, strained gross-out gags and repetition. De Niro also divides opinion: The Guardian credits him with keeping the film watchable, while Slant Magazine objects to his mugging.

Total Film
28 January 2005 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds the sequel entertaining, despite some jokes falling flat. It singles out the all-star cast’s exuberant performances, especially the chemistry between Hoffman and De Niro.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
22 December 2004 · John Hazelton
64*

The visible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. The paywall also hides what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
63*

The page identifies a review, but its contents are unavailable. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Andrew Collins
60

Collins finds the sequel entertaining, though some elements rely too heavily on the original. He praises Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand for stealing the film with their broad comic performances.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 December 2004 · ★★/4 · Nick Schager
50

Schager finds the sequel intermittently funny but mostly flat and redundant. He praises Dustin Hoffman’s good-natured comic performance, while criticizing the film’s strained outrageous gags and Robert De Niro’s mugging.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
35*

The review finds the sequel a disappointing retread, with only occasional amusement. It praises Hoffman and Streisand for enlivening their roles but says the strong cast is largely wasted on underdeveloped comedy.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 January 2005 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

Bradshaw finds the sequel tired and its comedy less effective than the original. He singles out Robert De Niro, whose performance keeps the film watchable.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 December 2004 · Todd McCarthy
30*

McCarthy finds the sequel fitfully funny but crude, and less amusing than the original. He singles out Dustin Hoffman’s energetic, mischievous performance as the film’s greatest source of spark.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
21 December 2004 · Nathan Rabin
10*

Rabin pans the sequel as a lazy, mercenary retread that wastes its celebrated cast. He particularly criticizes the recycled humiliation-based comedy and escalating gross-out gags.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
29 January 2005 · Daniel Saney
70*

The critic finds the sequel entertaining despite its lack of originality and overlong running time. They praise the sparkling performances, especially Dustin Hoffman and Barbra Streisand, while noting that the humor becomes repetitive.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
30 January 2005 · Josh Morrall
35*

Morrall finds the sequel forgettable and unoriginal, though its performances keep it from being a disappointment. He especially praises Barbra Streisand’s relaxed, well-paced performance and Dustin Hoffman’s comedic moments.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate