Critics’ reviews

Memories of Underdevelopment (1968)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 79: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Memories of Underdevelopment

79
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Memories of Underdevelopment, with praise clustering around its blend of fiction, still photography and documentary footage. The reviews find this approach politically complex, conveying post-revolutionary Havana without reducing it to propaganda or an uncomplicated account of revolutionary progress. Sergio Corrieri’s performance also draws admiration: his charm and emotional and intellectual paralysis give critics a compelling way into the film’s treatment of a man at odds with the history around him.

The reservations concern the demands the film makes and the distance it keeps from its protagonist. Empire finds it challenging but worth the attention, while The Hollywood Reporter notes that Sergio earns interest more readily than sympathy. The verifiable responses range from measured approval to strong enthusiasm, rather than sharp disagreement. Two entries lack sufficient accessible review text to establish their verdicts, so they offer no reliable evidence of a dissenting argument.

Slant Magazine
14 May 2003 · ★★★★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
100

Gonzalez finds the film difficult and enigmatic, portraying Cuba as trapped in an unfulfilled revolutionary promise. He praises its politically charged blend of fiction, still photography, and documentary footage.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 July 2008 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw calls the film tremendous, fascinating and a must-see. He praises its blend of dialogue, still photographs and documentary footage for conveying post-revolutionary Havana without dogmatism or wishful thinking.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
90*

The critic calls it one of the great films of its era. They praise Sergio Corrieri’s performance and single out the Hemingway Museum sequence for its rich ironies.

Read the full review →
Total Film
11 July 2008 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review is positive, finding the film a vibrant and surprising work rather than Marxist propaganda. It praises Sergio Corrieri’s portrayal of a charming man emotionally and intellectually paralyzed by history.

Read the full review →
Empire
9 June 2006 · David Parkinson
75*

The critic finds the film challenging but well worth the attention it demands. He praises its complex political perspective and use of documentary footage to illuminate Sergio’s outsider status.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
12 January 2018 · THR Staff
70*

The review regards the restored film as a distinctive, still-relevant landmark and a useful introduction to Cuba’s cinematic history. It praises Alea’s blend of documentary and fictional techniques, while noting the protagonist earns interest more than sympathy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
20 May 1973
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· RM
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its metadata gives historical context about the Cuban Film Institute, but no specific praise or complaint is available.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate