Critics’ reviews

Men in Black II (2002)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 49: 1 positive, 4 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Men in Black II

49
Positive
1
Mixed
4
Negative
5

The reviews lean towards disappointment: most critics find Men in Black II short of the original’s freshness, wit and surprise. Praise clusters around individual jokes and creatures rather than the story or central partnership. Frank the Pug earns particular affection, while the alien designs and visual effects give even some dissatisfied critics something to enjoy. The more receptive reviews find enough silly humour and brisk entertainment to make the repetition tolerable.

The main divide is over how far those scattered pleasures carry the film. Several critics describe the humour as dated or forced, and the harsher notices find the characters empty and the spectacle uninteresting. The Guardian goes further, finding that the leads’ chemistry has soured. Eye for Film supplies the clearest dissent, enjoying Will Smith and the offbeat jokes enough to accept a vague plot, leaving a broad spread between cheerful acceptance and marked dissatisfaction.

Screen Daily
30 June 2002 · John Hazelton
64*

The page identifies this as John Hazelton’s review of the 2002 film. The review’s verdict and specific praise or complaints are unavailable in the visible text.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
3 July 2002 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified. The available page text contains only a browser check.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
60*

Errigo finds the sequel likable and amusing, but less funny or surprising than the original. She praises its wickedly silly jokes and especially the comic discovery in a train-station locker.

Read the full review →
Total Film
1 August 2002 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the sequel watchable but forced and lacking the original’s wit, invention, and sparkle. Frank the Pug stands out as a lively comic highlight who helps rescue the film.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 July 2002 · Scott Tobias
40*

The critic finds the sequel disposable and cynical, though its brisk pace and gags provide mixed pleasures. He praises the parade of Rick Baker creatures and highlights David Cross’s cameo as especially terrific.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
40*

The review suggests the sequel feels dated compared with the original. It singles out the sense that its once-fresh ideas now feel old.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
26 June 2002 · ★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
38

Gonzalez finds the film soulless, dated, and reliant on stale vaudeville spectacle. He singles out its empty characters and outdated jokes as particular weaknesses.

Read the full review →
Variety
24 June 2002 · Todd McCarthy
35*

McCarthy finds the sequel sporadically amusing but lightweight, with its humor and attitude unable to sustain interest. He singles out Frank the pug as the film’s funniest presence, while praising the alien designs and visual effects.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 July 2002 · Peter Bradshaw
20*

Bradshaw finds the sequel soulless and uninspired despite its frenetic action and occasional funny lines. He singles out the lack of interest in the spectacle and says the leads’ chemistry has curdled.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 July 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
75*

The critic finds the film fun and entertaining, with Will Smith’s performance and the script’s offbeat jokes standing out. The plot surrounding The Light is vague, but the review considers style more important.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate