Critics’ reviews

Metro Manila (2013)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 70: 8 positive, 5 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Metro Manila

70
Positive
8
Mixed
5
Negative
1
IndieWire
19 August 2014 · A- · Nikola Grozdanovic
90

The critic praises the film as an expertly handled, engrossing story of family survival, with a particularly impressive ending. They single out the vivid capture of Metro Manila and John Arcila’s performance as standout strengths.

Read the full review →
Empire
11 September 2013 · Damon Wise
85*

Wise recommends the film as socially aware world cinema with gripping crime-thriller elements. He praises Sean Ellis’s balancing of its disparate elements and the heist’s satisfying, unpredictable twist.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 January 2013 · festival review · Damon Wise
80*

Wise finds the film poetic, honest and compellingly unpredictable. He praises its searingly realistic view of Manila and neatly scripted crime-story twists.

Read the full review →
Total Film
15 September 2013 · ★★★★ · Matt Glasby
80

The critic calls it an excellent, compassionate thriller and moving morality tale. They praise how the richly detailed character development makes the eventual thriller payoff especially affecting.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
16 January 2015 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
70*

O'Sullivan finds the film touching and persuasive overall, despite an ending that does not ring true. She especially praises the detailed city-life scenes and the lead performances.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
2 February 2013 · festival review · Mark Adams
64*

The paywall prevents access to the critic’s verdict. It also obscures what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 August 2014 · C+ · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
63

Vishnevetsky finds the film derivative and uneven, with its first two-thirds bogged down by conventional drama. He praises the interactions between Oscar and his new armored-truck partner, which effectively set up the twisty final third.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Brian Pendreigh
60

Pendreigh describes a crime drama that shifts from social realism into a more violent thriller. He singles out the turn toward secret cash and lethal gunplay as a striking change in direction.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 September 2013 · ★★★ · Trevor Johnston
60

Johnston gives the film three out of five stars, indicating a mixed assessment. The available page text does not reveal what he singles out for praise or criticism.

Read the full review →
Variety
27 January 2013 · festival review · Alissa Simon
45*

The critic finds the film overlong and prone to cliché, though its blend of soap-opera melodrama and action caper offers some freshness. She praises its formal craftsmanship and visually exciting robbery scenes, while faulting its showiness and sentimentality.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
18 August 2014 · ★½/4 · Kenji Fujishima
38

Fujishima argues that the film relies on familiar immigrant-story clichés and lacks the curiosity of its Filipino setting. He gives some credit to its visual storytelling and emotionally weighty moral conflicts, but criticizes its predictable turns and last-minute twists.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
27 April 2013 · ★★★★★ · Stefan Pape
100

Pape gives the film an enthusiastic verdict, praising its emotionally absorbing story of a family facing hardship. He especially singles out Jake Macapagal’s endearing performance as Oscar.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 September 2013 · Amber Wilkinson
90*

Wilkinson gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it Ellis’s strongest work to date. She praises its gripping narrative, poetic imagery and tight scripting, especially how the thriller elements build toward a carefully crafted conclusion.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
19 August 2014
75*

The headline indicates a positive verdict, describing the film as enticing and memorable. The page content is blocked, so no further praise or criticism can be verified.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate