Miami Vice (2006)

Dargis gives the film a positive verdict, appreciating its moody, modern reinvention of the television series. She particularly praises Michael Mann’s atmospheric visual style.

The available page metadata identifies this as a review, but does not reveal the critic’s verdict. The visible description provides context about Michael Mann’s career without singling out a specific strength or weakness in the film.

Kipp finds the film stylish but superficial, with a thin story and underdeveloped characters that make its long runtime drag. He praises Farrell and Foxx’s charismatic screen presence, especially when they are in action.

Braund finds the film flawed and overlong, but stylish and vastly superior entertainment. He especially praises Mann’s breathtaking nighttime images of Miami, which become the film’s true star.

The review finds the film a stylish, grown-up spectacle, though its drama can feel limp and over-styled. It praises the visual grit and the urgent chemistry between Farrell and Foxx, while criticizing Farrell’s swaggering performance.

Lowry finds the film stylish and atmospheric but overblown, with little substance and a sometimes opaque story. He praises Mann’s mastery of brooding atmosphere and the bursts of action that bolster the crime drama.

The critic finds the film overblown and confusing. They single out Gong Li’s struggle with her lines as a weakness.

Mackie finds the film a major disappointment despite its visual polish. He praises its glorious cinematography but faults the weak chemistry and mundane plot.

Carty finds the film stylish and better than routine action fare, but ultimately flawed by its confusing plot and restrained performances. He particularly praises Mann’s cinematography and urban visuals, while faulting the camerawork and lack of character interaction.

The review finds the remake formulaic and frustrating even as entertainment. It criticises the superficial romance, cheesy score, and unresolved ending.