Critics’ reviews

Mon Oncle (1958)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 73: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Mon Oncle

73
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Mon Oncle, finding Tati’s comedy inventive and its satire of modern living pointed without losing its warmth. Praise centres on the contrast between Hulot’s disorderly neighbourhood and the Arpels’ automated home, where domestic technology and bourgeois habits supply the jokes. The reviews particularly value the visual composition, expert blocking and creative sound, which make the clash between two ways of life funny while giving the changing surroundings a serious edge.

Reservations concern pace and how insistently the film makes its case, rather than a failure of comic invention. Empire finds the slow pace and repetition better suited to a shorter feature, while Slant Magazine enjoys the film but considers it didactic, depressing and overly nostalgic. The spread is fairly narrow, with no outright negative verdicts among the supplied ratings, though one inaccessible review offers no usable explanation for its score.

The AV Club
19 April 2002 · Keith Phipps
85*

Phipps praises Tati’s films for combining comedy and beauty, and considers Mon Oncle a refined, funny work with serious themes. He singles out its depiction of a changing Paris, where Hulot’s old neighborhood gives way to modernity.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
6 September 2010 · ★★★/4 · Christian Blauvelt
75

The critic finds the film pleasurable despite calling it didactic, depressing, and overly nostalgic. He praises its art direction, especially the striking composition of the Arpel home at night.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
11 September 2009 · Richard Brody
75*

Brody presents the film as an angry, gleeful satire of modernization. He singles out its attack on domestic technology, cleanliness, and the industrial regimentation they encourage.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1957 · Variety Staff
75*

The review finds the comedy somewhat long but inventive, warm and poetically satirical. It praises the expert blocking, creative sound and comic contrast between two ways of life.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· JS
70*

The available blurb presents the film favorably, highlighting Tati’s comic contrast between the Arpels’ automated modernist house and Hulot’s bohemian disorder. The article text is unavailable, so the finer details of the critic’s assessment cannot be confirmed.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
65*

Thomas finds the film delightful and praises its inspired satire of bourgeois snobbery. He says its slow pace and repetition make it feel better suited to a short feature.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page could not be accessed, so its verdict is unavailable. No article text was provided to identify what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate