
Most critics welcome Moonage Daydream as an immersive, unconventional portrait of Bowie, with praise concentrated on its archival footage, editing and sound. The remastered concert performances draw particular enthusiasm, giving the music a force that even some detractors acknowledge. Admirers find that Morgen’s restless montage captures Bowie’s appetite for reinvention, while his own interviews let him guide the portrait. For these critics, the departure from a conventional biography is central to its appeal.
The spread is wide, however, and the same sensory approach strikes others as exhausting or short on insight. Reservations extend beyond the negative reviews: sympathetic critics also note missing context, omissions and an overly reverent treatment of Bowie. The Hollywood Reporter finds the film shapeless and distancing despite admiring the performances. The New Yorker objects more fundamentally, arguing that the visual bombardment produces an inert, sanctified portrait that misses much of Bowie’s wit and collaborative spirit.
T
Time Out
24 May 2022 · ★★★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
100
The review presents the documentary as almost as extraordinary as Bowie himself. It singles out the film’s cosmic, spectacular, music-filled approach for praise.
Read the full review →E
Empire
12 September 2022 · Lou Thomas
90*
Thomas calls it a definitive, essential portrait of Bowie and a triumph despite a few omissions. He especially praises the inventive visual presentation and the film’s use of rare performance footage and Bowie’s music.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
18 September 2022 · Mark Kermode
90*
Kermode finds the film a dazzling, loving tribute that captures some of Bowie’s adventurous spirit, though it cannot be definitive. He praises its kaleidoscopic archival collage and the profound affection running through it.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
15 September 2022 · Carlos Aguilar
85*
Aguilar considers the documentary a worthy tribute that lets Bowie’s own words and art shape its portrait. He praises Morgen’s sensorial blend of psychedelic imagery, concert footage and music for capturing Bowie’s spirit.
Read the full review →V
Variety
25 May 2022 · Critics Pick · Owen Gleiberman
85*
Gleiberman praises the film as a vivid, unconventional meditation that brings viewers closer to Bowie’s enigmatic identity. He particularly singles out the concert footage and powerful sound, while wishing the film had given more attention to Nile Rodgers and “Station to Station.”
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
24 May 2022 · B+ · Siddhant Adlakha
83
The critic finds the documentary an ambitious, immersive portrait that captures Bowie’s influence and humanity. The film’s archival imagery and loud, concert-like sound are praised, though its authorized perspective avoids controversy.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
12 September 2022 · B+ · Jordan Hoffman
83
Hoffman praises the film as an ambitious, immersive alternative to a conventional Bowie documentary, though its associative montage can leave viewers wanting more context. He singles out Morgen’s sure-handed editing and the film’s ability to make Bowie’s restless reinvention feel like a cinematic experience.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
★★★★ · Terry Staunton
80
Staunton finds the documentary engrossing, presenting Bowie as a driven and constantly inventive artist. He praises the film’s dizzying mosaic of footage and archive recordings, with Bowie’s own interviews serving as narration.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
24 May 2022 · ★★★★ · Jordan Farley
80
Farley finds the documentary an electrifying, thrillingly unique take on Bowie, though its unconventional approach may not work for everyone. He particularly praises the remastered performance footage and surround-sound mix for making the music feel newly vivid.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
festival review · Ed Gibbs
75*
The critic finds the film an immersive, fitting tribute that keeps Bowie’s legacy feeling current. The sonic and visual presentation is singled out for praise, though the critic notes omissions and a preference for better-known songs.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
26 May 2022 · BFI
75*
The review finds Morgen’s maximalist portrait compelling, though its cosmic, existential framing initially seems difficult to sustain. It praises the abundance of archival material and Bowie’s candid interview appearances, especially the vivid remastered live performances.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
9 September 2022 · ★★★/4 · Kenji Fujishima
75
Fujishima finds the documentary a vivid, often compelling tribute, though its hero worship leaves important complexity out. He praises its rare archival material and restless editing for conveying Bowie’s constant reinvention.
Read the full review →R
RogerEbert.com
festival review
65*
The accessible page provides no critical verdict on the film. It offers no readable praise or complaint to identify.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
24 May 2022 · festival review · Fionnuala Halligan
65*
The standfirst frames the documentary as a dizzying sensory voyage, but the critic’s full verdict is unavailable. It singles out Morgen’s journey through Bowie’s estate as the film’s defining feature.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
15 September 2022
65*
The page content is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the available text.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
15 September 2022 · ★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
40
O'Sullivan finds the film tedious overall, arguing that its endless, controlled interview excerpts make Bowie seem boring. She praises the opening concert footage for its energy and intoxicating portrait of Ziggy Stardust.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
24 May 2022 · festival review · David Rooney
25*
Rooney finds the film distancing, shapeless, and short on insight, ultimately more enervating than enlightening. He praises the concert footage, especially the performances from Bowie’s Berlin years.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
12 September 2022 · Hilton Als
25*
Als argues that the documentary is visually bombastic but strangely inert, offering a limited and overly sanctified portrait of Bowie. He praises Bowie’s collaborative spirit, wit, and musical evolution, which he says the film largely fails to capture.
Read the full review →C
Collider
13 September 2022 · A+ · Maggie Boccella
100
Boccella calls the film a maximalist, deeply affecting masterwork and a vivid tribute to Bowie’s creative spirit. She especially praises its archival footage, music, and immersive presentation for capturing the experience of loving Bowie.
Read the full review →D
Deadline
24 May 2022 · festival review · Matthew Carey
90*
The critic finds the documentary a powerful tribute that presents Bowie primarily as an artist and invites viewers to experience his creative world. He especially praises its immersive editing and the wealth of archival material.
Read the full review →/
/Film
25 May 2022 · 9/10 · Rafael Motamayor
90
The critic finds the documentary an eclectic, fascinating portrait that leaves viewers inspired by Bowie’s appetite for life. They especially praise the remastered concert footage and sound, which create an exhilarating concert experience.
Read the full review →The critic finds the documentary loving, engaging, and worthy of Bowie’s legacy. They praise how the archive footage captures his charisma and stage presence across the decades.
Read the full review →The critic calls the film an impressive, unconventional portrait of Bowie and urges readers to seek it out. They praise its sensory blend of live footage, visual flourishes, and sound, while noting its focus on the Ziggy years.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
16 September 2022 · Morgan Enos
85*
The critic calls the documentary a captivating accomplishment that avoids the usual music-documentary formula. They praise its surreal audiovisual approach to exploring Bowie’s life and inner world.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
15 September 2022 · festival review
85*
The critic praises the film as a bracing, gloriously messy celebration of Bowie, though its relentless chaos may exhaust some viewers. They single out its intricate audiovisual construction and powerful performances, including “Heroes” and “Cracked Actor.”
Read the full review →P
The Playlist
24 May 2022 · festival review
80*
The headline presents the film as an exuberant, transporting experience. It singles out the musical space-extravaganza approach, though the article itself was inaccessible.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
16 September 2022 · 5 out of 5 · Tony Sokol
78*
Sokol finds the documentary immersive, intimate, and evocative, though it is not a definitive biography. He praises the inventive musical editing and archival material for bringing Bowie’s artistic mind to life.
Read the full review →S
The Skinny
18 July 2022 · ★★★ · Jamie Dunn
60
The review finds the documentary visually and aurally exhilarating but ultimately exhausting. It praises the carefully chosen Bowie footage and music, especially the use of “Hello Spaceboy.”
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate