Critics’ reviews

Morbius (2022)

23 reviews from 23 publications. Critics’ score 36: 2 positive, 3 mixed, 18 negative.

Back to our review of Morbius

36
Positive
2
Mixed
3
Negative
18

Most critics find Morbius a dull, derivative vampire origin story, with thin characters and action that offers little excitement. The limited praise clusters around the performances: several reviews credit Jared Leto’s commitment, while Matt Smith supplies energy that they find lacking elsewhere. Some also see promise in the mad-scientist premise and find moments of atmosphere or visual interest, though few consider these enough to compensate for the script.

The reservations centre on predictable plotting, confusing effects and poorly staged or repetitive combat. Performances divide opinion too, with Leto judged committed by some and lifeless by others. The spread is wide despite the strongly negative consensus: Vulture finds a brisk, atmospheric thriller with effective scares and heartfelt acting, while Screen Daily enjoys the spirited cast and assured direction. These favourable reviews find modest genre pleasures where most critics see an underdeveloped franchise exercise.

Vulture
1 April 2022 · Bilge Ebiri
75*

Despite seeming unnecessary, the film works as a tight, brisk mad-scientist thriller with strong atmosphere, effective scares, and heartfelt performances from Leto and Matt Smith. Espinosa brings an engaging dreamy style to its nocturnal world.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
31 March 2022
70*

The critic finds it a consistently enjoyable franchise start-up elevated by spirited performances and the director’s sure hand, offering modest genre pleasures and a spooky vibe.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 March 2022 · Manohla Dargis
65*

The critic finds that Morbius does not suck as a movie and provides a diverting neo-vampiric tale despite the odds. The first half is better shaped, with coherent characters and visuals that sometimes allow light to shine through the gloom.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
30 March 2022 · C- · Todd Gilchrist
50

A run-of-the-mill, capably acted origin story that is professionally mounted but mostly lifeless and disappointing after years of anticipation. It leans on familiar vampire clichés and horror visuals without delivering excitement or depth.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 March 2022 · ★★ · Sophie Butcher
40

The core concept of two friends bonded by suffering has promise but is undermined by messy action, wafer-thin characters and a slight plot. Solid performances and flashes of visual interest cannot save the flat, forgettable result.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
31 March 2022 · ★★ · Sabastian Astley
40

The critic finds the film disappointing overall, with a dated plot, visually confusing CGI and predictable storytelling that reaches new depths.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
30 March 2022 · David Rooney
40*

The film starts promisingly but fails to sustain intensity, becoming thin on story and repetitive in its action. Leto's committed performance stands out amid a script that makes the movie feel like another boilerplate Venom-like entry without the humor.

Read the full review →
Financial Times
31 March 2022 · ★☆☆☆☆ · Leslie Felperin
30*

The vampiric Marvel movie is a bloody mess and diabolical shambles suggesting carnage in the edit suite. It singles out the inexplicable stumps of discarded subplots and hollowness of performances for complaint.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
31 March 2022 · Kim Newman
30*

The critic calls it a sketchy mess with thin, disposable secondary characters and a lack of laughs or oddness that partially redeems the Venom films.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
31 March 2022 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

The film is an amazingly pointless and dumb vampire superhero yarn with a muddled good/bad setup and silly demonic transformations. It singles out the bafflingly dull story and post-credit stings for complaint.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
30*

The film is a hopeless, thuddingly generic Marvel venture where CGI effects undermine the lead performance. It singles out the lengthy, unengaging runtime and generic plot for complaint.

Read the full review →
Total Film
31 March 2022
30*

This dull, derivative origin story is dead on arrival and a shameless exercise in comic-book universe expansion. Slick direction and committed performances are let down by sub-par effects, underpowered action and a character never adequately sketched.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 March 2022 · Owen Gleiberman
25*

The critic finds Morbius generic and jarringly so, a flimsy time-killer and early-April placeholder that is neither original nor a good story. The lead character lacks flavor, the FX are creaky, and the script shows no signs of meaningful revision or added spice.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
31 March 2022 · Robert Daniels
20*

The critic calls Morbius a misbegotten, artistically bankrupt bid that is the nadir of comic book cinema and a colossal snore. The film suffers from dreadful special effects, a lack of heart in the lead performance, and an over-reliance on generic VFX instead of sturdy storytelling or effective scares.

Read the full review →
The Times
31 March 2022
10*

The film is an appalling vampire snooze-fest without jeopardy, originality, coherence or compelling characters. It singles out Jared Leto's dead-eyed performance and poor writing/direction for complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
31 March 2022 · Cathy Brennan
10*

The critic finds it a super-sized disaster and a chore to sit through, with bland action, thin characterisation and a leaden performance from Leto.

Read the full review →
Deadline
30 March 2022 · Anna Smith
50*

The critic finds the film isn’t terrible, with good work from Leto and slick VFX providing modest entertainment, but notes it’s unlikely to please crowds like recent Spider-Man films and criticizes the script for favoring exposition.

Read the full review →
Collider
30 March 2022 · D+ · Emma Kiely
43

The film is stale, unoriginal, and forgettable due to a lazy script that rushes through backstory and lacks character depth or arcs. Leto brings some comfort to the role despite the weak material.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
30 March 2022 · ★★ · David Crow
40

The critic finds the film a lifeless, mechanical mash-up of better movies that fails to deliver on its vampire premise or as a Spider-Man spin-off. They single out its rote storytelling and lack of visual flair or engaging performances for complaint.

Read the full review →
Polygon
31 March 2022 · Joshua Rivera
30*

The film makes Jared Leto boring and lacks imagination or energy, feeling algorithmically calibrated with unimaginative action. It only briefly comes to life through Matt Smith's more dynamic villain performance.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
30 March 2022
30*

The review calls it an underwhelming Marvel horror where the mad-scientist setup is fun but drags into a usual big battle with little character investment; praises Adria Arjona’s performance as the standout.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
30 March 2022 · Jason Bailey
20*

The film is a dull, depressing comic-book/horror hybrid that fails to deliver any thrills or surprises. The critic singles out the poorly staged and choppily edited action scenes for particular complaint.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
1 April 2022 · Miles Surrey
10*

The film is breathtakingly terrible and excruciating to watch, with a rote script and lack of personality or tone. Leto is surprisingly muted and devoid of charisma in the lead role.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate