Critics’ reviews

Mulan (2020)

31 reviews from 31 publications. Critics’ score 59: 11 positive, 14 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of Mulan

59
Positive
11
Mixed
14
Negative
6

The consensus on Mulan is mixed, with praise clustering around its visual scale, vivid colours, costumes and production design. Many critics find the battle sequences exciting, and Liu Yifei’s performance wins substantial support for giving the heroine presence and resolve. The more enthusiastic reviews welcome a reimagining that departs confidently from the animated film. Even several less persuaded critics admire the spectacle, though they find the storytelling less engaging.

The spread is wide, and the disagreements extend beyond how much the missing humour and charm matter. Some reviews praise the fight choreography; others say choppy editing and conspicuous visual effects weaken it. Rushed plotting, thin characterisation and an overly solemn tone recur among the reservations. Eye for Film praises the nuanced portrayal of Mulan and Xianniang, while The Hollywood Reporter finds their relationship underdeveloped. That divide reflects a broader split over whether the film gives its heroine enough emotional depth.

Empire
3 September 2020 · Beth Webb
90*

Webb considers it a dazzling, moving success and the best live-action Disney adaptation to date. She particularly praises the meticulously staged fight scenes and Liu Yifei’s commanding performance, while noting that the story sometimes shifts too quickly.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
3 September 2020 · B+ · Kate Erbland
83

Erbland finds the live-action adaptation an energetic, successful reimagining of the familiar story. She especially praises Liu Yifei’s performance and the thrilling wuxia-style action, while noting some convoluted villain-focused plotting.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
4 September 2020 · ★★★★ · Charlotte O'Sullivan
80

O'Sullivan finds the update a triumphant, entertaining reinvention of the animated original. She particularly praises Liu's magnetic performance and the film's strikingly odd set-pieces.

Read the full review →
Variety
3 September 2020 · Peter Debruge
70*

Debruge finds the remake visually impressive and culturally distinctive, despite rushed pacing and an underwritten heroine. He particularly praises its striking action and Asian-cinema-inspired spectacle.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
4 September 2020 · Tim Grierson
64*

The accessible text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. The standfirst notes that Disney’s live-action epic is going directly into homes.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 September 2020 · C+ · Beatrice Loayza
63

The review finds the remake an improvement over Disney’s earlier live-action adaptations, but says it remains superficial and emotionally underdeveloped. It praises the film’s striking production design and costumes, while criticizing its rushed storytelling and underused action choreography.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
4 September 2020 · 3/3/3 · Leila Latif
60

Latif finds the film exciting and beautiful but ultimately less triumphant than hoped. She praises Liu Yifei’s compelling performance, while criticizing the frantic editing and arbitrary slow motion.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 September 2020 · ★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
60

Bradshaw finds it entertaining but glossy and straightforward, with its ambitions stopping short of pushing the envelope. He praises the well-managed, exciting battle scenes, though he says their CGI sheen diminishes their visceral power.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
3 September 2020 · Joseph Walsh
60*

Walsh calls the remake competent and neat enough, though it loses much of the original’s heart and humour. He singles out the Wuxia fight sequences and Harry Gregson-Williams’s score for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 September 2020 · ★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
60

The review finds the film visually impressive but emotionally unengaging. It singles out the imagery as a feast for the eyes while saying the story does little for the heart.

Read the full review →
Total Film
3 September 2020 · ★★★ · Neil Smith
60

Smith finds the remake occasionally dazzling but ultimately less funny and dramatic than it could have been. He praises its sweeping spectacle and thrilling avalanche sequence, while criticizing its ponderous stretches and the loss of Mulan’s personality.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 September 2020 · Justin Chang
45*

Chang finds the film a disappointing but admirable muddle, caught between cultural contradictions and bluntly delivered lessons. He praises Gong Li’s commanding presence, which lends the spectacle a glimmer of authenticity.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
3 September 2020 · Huw Fullerton
45*

The review finds the remake visually arresting but less charming than the animated original. It praises the visuals while faulting the loss of charm.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
3 September 2020 · Inkoo Kang
30*

Kang finds the film visually dazzling but ultimately lacking in vision and emotional resonance. She singles out its thin characterization, especially the underdeveloped relationship between Mulan and Xianniang, as a central flaw.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 September 2020 · Jeannette Catsoulis
30*

Catsoulis gives the film a negative verdict, finding the remake bloodless despite its scale. She singles out its visually polished presentation, which cannot make the story feel alive.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
4 September 2020 · BFI
25*

The review finds the remake shallow and ideologically antiquated despite Liu Yifei’s formidable presence. It praises Gong Li’s majestic performance but criticizes the action’s disorienting editing and lack of wuxia grace.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
3 September 2020 · ★/4 · Sam C. Mac
25

The critic finds the remake lazy, unconvincing, and weighed down by nationalist messaging. They particularly fault the wooden performance, unconvincing CGI, and choppy action editing.

Read the full review →
Vulture
4 September 2020 · Alison Willmore
20*

Willmore finds the film a dour, clunky spectacle whose cultural balancing act leaves its motivations muddled. She praises its sweeping scale and vivid use of color, despite criticizing its choppy action and writing.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
3 September 2020 · Gabriella Geisinger
90*

The critic calls this the best Disney remake and says it may surpass the animated original. They praise its realism and Liu Yifei’s performance, while noting that its cultural perspective suffers from a predominantly white team behind the camera.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
85*

The critic finds Mulan spectacular, entertaining and ultimately inspiring despite some weaknesses in the script. They particularly praise the performances of Liu Yifei and Gong Li, along with the film’s vibrant visuals and battle sequences.

Read the full review →
NME
85*

The review calls the film the best live-action Disney adaptation to date, praising its empowering take on Mulan. It singles out Liu Yifei’s strong performance and Niki Caro’s visual approach, while noting that the villain feels underdeveloped.

Read the full review →
Collider
3 September 2020 · B+ · Matt Goldberg
83

Goldberg finds the adaptation vibrant, exciting, and emotionally faithful while giving the story its own identity. He especially praises its visual scale, lavish costumes, and confident departures from the animated film.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
26 April 2021 · Amber Wilkinson
80*

Wilkinson finds the reimagining fresh, emotionally engaging and impressively spectacular. She singles out the nuanced portrayal of Mulan and Xianniang, alongside the balletic action sequences, for praise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
3 September 2020 · ★★★½ · Natalie Zutter
70

The review finds the remake worthy and relevant, though it does not surpass its animated predecessor or fully realize its themes. It praises the dazzling fight choreography for showcasing Mulan’s cleverness and resourcefulness.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
4 September 2020
70*

The critic finds the remake satisfying and pretty good, despite some awkward visual effects. They praise its fresh, heartfelt interpretation and emphasis on Mulan’s empowerment.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
8 September 2020 · Mark Harrison
68*

The review finds this a fresher, better-looking Disney remake, though it remains less effective than the animated original and plays too dryly. It praises the dazzling action and Mandy Walker’s cinematography, especially the film’s vivid colours and practical feel.

Read the full review →
Paste
5 September 2020 · 6.8 · Amy Amatangelo
64*

The critic finds the film visually glorious but emotionally hollow, and says it may not live up to the anticipation. She praises its vibrant visuals and its example of a heroine who defines her own story, while warning that the graphic violence makes it unsuitable for young children.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
3 September 2020
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
/Film
3 September 2020 · 6/10 · Hoai-Tran Bui
60

Bui finds the remake visually splendid and compelling in places, but ultimately too dour and burdened by its political and scripted compromises. She singles out Caro’s direction and the majestic battle sequences as its greatest strengths.

Read the full review →
Consequence
3 September 2020 · Josh Spiegel
45*

The critic finds the film a serious, visually striking improvement over some Disney remakes, but says its superhero turn is an unwelcome detour. The cinematography earns praise, while the action scenes are faulted for choppy editing.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
8 September 2020 · Manuela Lazic
25*

Lazic finds the remake disappointing, arguing that its effort to deliver an empowered heroine leaves Mulan flat and its feminism compromised. She particularly criticizes the characterless portrayals of Mulan and Xianniang, which reduce women’s strength to a slogan.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate