Critics’ reviews

National Treasure (2004)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 40: 0 positive, 2 mixed, 8 negative.

Back to our review of National Treasure

40
Positive
0
Mixed
2
Negative
8

Most critics find National Treasure a sluggish, unconvincing adventure, with familiar plotting and action that struggles to generate excitement. The recurring complaint is that the film takes its far-fetched historical conspiracies too seriously without making the clues or suspense sufficiently engaging. Praise is scattered rather than concentrated: some reviews find Nicolas Cage amiable or charming, while individual performances by Sean Bean, Diane Kruger and Jon Voight offer occasional relief from the generally underwhelming ensemble.

The sharpest disagreements concern Cage and the central heist. His performance strikes some critics as personable, others as lifeless or smug; Empire finds the Declaration of Independence theft engaging, while Variety singles it out as a disappointment. The available verdicts range from qualified disappointment to outright boredom, with little enthusiasm for the film as a whole. Two of the ten listed reviews have no accessible verdict, so their scores offer no usable explanation of their reservations.

Screen Daily
19 November 2004 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The page identifies this as a review but does not expose the critic’s verdict. The paywall also hides what the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TJ
64*

The review’s verdict cannot be determined because its article text is unavailable. The metadata describes a treasure map hidden in the Declaration of Independence, but offers no evaluative detail.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Ian Freer
40

Freer finds the film unsuccessful at combining its historical mystery, conspiracy thriller and action-adventure elements. He particularly faults Nicolas Cage’s lifeless performance and the limp action sequences.

Read the full review →
Total Film
26 December 2004 · ★★ · Total Film
40

The review finds the film slick but uninvolving, and far inferior to Indiana Jones. It praises Nicolas Cage’s charm and Sean Bean’s charismatic performance, while faulting the familiar plotting and much of the supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
18 November 2004 · ★½/4 · Nick Schager
38

Schager dismisses the film as a lazy, tedious adventure that takes its preposterous plot too seriously. He singles out Cage’s smug performance and the score’s mechanical attempts to manufacture suspense as especially damaging.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · William Thomas
35*

Thomas finds the film a hokey, sluggish compromise, though its plot earns some curiosity. He praises the engaging Declaration heist and Diane Kruger’s spark.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 December 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
35*

Bradshaw finds the film outrageously silly, though occasionally amusing. He singles out Nicolas Cage’s amiable performance and the adventure’s convoluted conspiracies.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
15 November 2004 · Nathan Rabin
25*

Rabin finds the adventure tedious, slackly paced, and unable to embrace its own absurdity. He singles out Cage’s dull, low-energy performance as a particular disappointment.

Read the full review →
Variety
18 November 2004 · Scott Foundas
20*

Foundas finds the film long-winded and ineffective, with neither its serial-style suspense nor its action delivering excitement. He singles out the underwhelming set pieces, especially the Declaration of Independence heist, as a key disappointment.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
23 December 2004 · ★★ · Gator MacReady
40

The critic calls the film boring and excessively tame. Jon Voight is singled out as the only bright spot, while the rest of the cast and the clues are criticized.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate