Critics’ reviews

Ne Zha 2 (2025)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 67: 7 positive, 4 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Ne Zha 2

67
Positive
7
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Most critics respond positively to Ne Zha 2, with praise concentrated on its detailed animation, inventive action and sheer scale. The reviews repeatedly single out the visual variety, character animation and elaborate battles, even when the storytelling proves harder to enjoy. There is broad agreement that the film offers plenty to look at, though considerably less agreement about how well its drama sustains that spectacle.

Reservations centre on dense mythology, an overcomplicated plot and action that can become repetitive or exhausting. The spread runs from enthusiastic recommendations with caveats to mixed responses, rather than outright rejection. Emotional engagement is a particular dividing line: Slant Magazine finds depth in the film’s treatment of hope, love and mutual respect, while The AV Club finds it emotionally underwhelming. The humour also splits opinion, with some reviews enjoying the slapstick and others finding the crudeness a distraction.

IndieWire
22 August 2025 · B · Wilson Chapman
77

Chapman finds the film a visually spectacular epic that is good but held back by excessive length, cluttered pacing, and crude humor. He especially praises the vivid, intricate animation and inventive action sequences.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
21 August 2025 · B · Tara Bennett
77

Bennett finds the film visually astonishing but emotionally underwhelming. She praises its richly detailed animation while criticizing its overstuffed story and relentless battles.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 August 2025 · ★★★/4 · Justin Clark
75

Clark finds the sequel’s emotional depth and mythological spectacle compelling, despite its sprawling story and demanding mythology. He especially praises the jaw-dropping action and the third act’s themes of hope, love, and mutual respect.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 March 2025 · Phil Hoad
75*

Hoad finds the film’s artistry overwhelming, despite a story that could use dramatic improvement. He singles out its dazzling visual range, especially the watercourse fight and the pagoda mountain.

Read the full review →
Empire
21 March 2025 · John Nugent
70*

The review finds the film awe-inspiring and entertaining, though its maximalism can be exhausting and hard to follow. It particularly praises the immense scale of the animation and battle sequences.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
11 March 2025 · Elizabeth Kerr
70*

The review presents the sequel as an energetic, positive big-screen spectacle. It singles out the film’s scale as a reason it is made for the big screen.

Read the full review →
Variety
2 March 2025 · Carlos Aguilar
70*

Aguilar finds the sequel a breathtaking visual spectacle, though its dense lore and relentless information can overwhelm. He especially praises its character animation, production design, and astonishing action sequences.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page URL identifies this as a review, but its verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be confirmed because access is blocked.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
18 March 2025 · BFI
60*

The review finds the story convoluted and difficult for newcomers, though the film’s energetic action and humour make it an engaging spectacle. It praises the rowdy fights and slapstick while noting that the mythology-heavy plot and large cast can be hard to follow.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 August 2025 · Frank Scheck
45*

The critic finds the sequel visually stunning but chaotic, with an overcomplicated story and repetitive action. The spectacular animation is the main strength, while the cluttered plot and juvenile humor are drawbacks.

Read the full review →
Deadline
14 February 2025 · Fred Topel
55*

Topel finds the sequel visually engaging but says its elaborate plotting becomes exhausting. He praises the animation and graceful martial-arts battles, while noting that the story’s many added complications can be difficult to follow.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate