Critics’ reviews

Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian (2009)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 51: 3 positive, 6 mixed, 6 negative.

Back to our review of Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian

51
Positive
3
Mixed
6
Negative
6

The reviews split almost evenly, with as many critics finding the sequel flat as finding it fun, and most of the praise landing on the same few things. The special effects, particularly the sequence in which paintings and sculptures join the chase, are singled out repeatedly as the point where the film comes alive. Amy Adams’s Amelia Earhart is the performance most often mentioned, with Hank Azaria’s Kahmunrah close behind, and several critics allow that it is faster and funnier than the first film.

The reservations cluster on story. Critics who dislike it call it overstuffed, nearly plotless and a string of loosely connected gags, with slapstick standing in where a plot should be, and Time Out notes how little story remains once the original’s father-and-son thread is dropped. The spread is wide, from four stars at the Evening Standard to one at Den of Geek. Eye for Film is the lone dissenter on Adams, finding her grating rather than buoyant.

Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · 4 stars · The Standard
77*

The critic finds the film silly, cheerful and entertaining, despite some sentiment that threatens to blunt its invention. They single out the Smithsonian gallery sequence, where paintings and sculptures join the action, as its extra punch.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
24 May 2009 · Philip French
75*

French finds the sequel superior to its predecessor despite its near-repeat premise. He praises the astonishing special effects and the film’s upbeat spirit.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
19 May 2009 · The Associated Press
65*

The review finds the sequel improved and entertaining, though it still feels like loosely connected bits rather than a cohesive whole. It especially praises the visual effects bringing famous artworks to life, along with Amy Adams’s spirited Amelia Earhart.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
20 May 2009 · Tim Grierson
64*

The visible page identifies this as a review but does not reveal the critic’s verdict. The paywall also conceals what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 May 2009 · A. O. Scott
64*

The page returned only an access error, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be established. No review text was available to summarize.

Read the full review →
Empire
29 October 2008 · Helen O'Hara
60*

The critic finds it a faster, funnier improvement on the first film, but still a disappointment. Amy Adams’s Amelia Earhart and Hank Azaria’s villain stand out, while slapstick and pop-culture gags squander the family-friendly historical potential.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Karen Krizanovich
60

The review gives this lively sequel a moderately favorable verdict. It highlights the witty exchanges with Kahmunrah and the colorful historical villains.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 May 2009 · ★★/4 · Nick Schager
50

Schager finds the sequel flat and unable to deliver wonder, mirth, or suspense. He praises Amy Adams’s buoyant performance as an antidote to the film’s crowded, chaotic proceedings.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 May 2009 · ★★
40

The critic finds the sequel virtually plotless and regards it as a disappointing follow-up. They single out the loss of the original film’s deadbeat-dad drama as one sign of how little story remains.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 May 2009 · Betsy Sharkey
30*

Sharkey finds the sequel silly and overstuffed, with too much pointless slapstick to make it work as a movie. She praises Amy Adams’s lively, stylish performance as Amelia Earhart.

Read the full review →
Variety
20 May 2009 · Lael Loewenstein
30*

Loewenstein finds the sequel overstuffed and less engaging than its predecessor, with spectacle and gags standing in for a stronger story. She praises the animated artworks, especially the hopping Balloon Dog, while criticizing the film’s lack of focus on Larry.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
21 May 2009 · Scott Tobias
20*

Tobias finds the sequel chaotic, unfunny, and less coherent than the original, despite a few marginal improvements. He singles out Amy Adams’s plucky Amelia Earhart performance for praise, while criticizing the crowded special effects and baffling plot.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 May 2009 · Maria Realf
70*

Realf finds the sequel bigger and more spectacular, and recommends it as good family fun despite its predictable plot. She praises the imaginative special effects, while noting that Amy Adams’s portrayal becomes grating.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
6 November 2009 · Jon Lyus
40*

The critic finds the sequel entertaining but bloated and less charming than the original. Hank Azaria’s performance as Kahmunrah stands out, while the overcrowded plot and CGI-heavy spectacle weaken the film.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
18 May 2009 · ★ · Michael Hague
20

Hague considers the sequel a cynical, humorless disappointment that falls far short of the original. He singles out Hank Azaria’s Kahmunrah as a scene-stealing highlight amid a wasted cast.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate