Critics’ reviews

Nine Queens (2000)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 80: 9 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Nine Queens

80
Positive
9
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics find Nine Queens a clever, entertaining con thriller, with praise concentrated on its intricate screenplay and lively performances. The escalating swindles sustain tension while leaving space for humour, and Ricardo Darín receives particular attention for his charisma and chemistry with Gastón Pauls. Several reviews also find substance beneath the trickery, pointing to the film’s observations of Argentine society, politics and greed. The direction and photography draw approval for keeping the complicated plotting brisk and clear.

The reservations concern how much that plotting can bear. Some critics accept questionable details as part of the pleasure; others find the deception predictable or overcomplicated. Slant Magazine enjoys the performances but regards the story as derivative, singling out Leticia Brédice for special praise. Eye for Film offers the sharpest dissent, finding energy and intrigue but arguing that the accumulated cleverness feels like a cheat. The spread is fairly wide, though enthusiasm clearly predominates.

Variety
9 September 2001 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
95*

McCarthy praises the film as a clever, superbly acted suspenser with an exceptionally engaging plot. He singles out the screenplay’s escalating swindles and Darin’s charismatic performance as Marcos.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Matthew Turner
90*

Turner gives the film an enthusiastic verdict, calling it one of the year's most enjoyable films. He especially praises its performances, snappy photography and razor-sharp, twist-filled script.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
90*

The critic calls it an exceptionally entertaining, clever film. They single out its suspenseful con-game plotting and unobtrusive direction against an unfamiliar Buenos Aires backdrop.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
15 April 2002 · Brandon Judell
90*

The critic gives the film a strongly positive verdict, finding it even more compelling on a second viewing. They praise its intricate plotting, lively performances, and sharp observations of Argentine society.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 April 2002 · Kevin Thomas
90*

Thomas gives the film an enthusiastic verdict, praising its clever, funny con-man story and sustained tension. He especially singles out Ricardo Darin’s performance and the lively chemistry between him and Gaston Pauls.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 July 2025 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

Bradshaw calls the film outstanding, praising its deliciously cynical double-dealing and enduring questions about greed. He singles out the final-credits payoff as an amusing finish.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 July 2002 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review is strongly positive, calling the film smart and propulsive. It singles out the nimble performances and the political dimension beneath the caper plot.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 April 2002 · Keith Phipps
75*

Phipps regards the film as a fine con picture whose poetic logic makes up for plot details that do not always stand to reason. He praises its portrayal of con artistry as a lifestyle with existential implications.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· NB
75*

The review presents the film as accomplished, highly entertaining thriller fare. It singles out the film’s tricksy construction and sting-in-the-tail payoff.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 March 2001 · festival review
65*

The headline identifies this as a film-festival review of Nine Queens. The blocked page provides no critic verdict or specific praise to summarize.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
23 October 2001 · ★★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
62

Gonzalez finds the film entertaining but overly derivative, with little at stake beyond an easily anticipated double-cross. He praises Ricardo Darín and Gastón Pauls, while singling out Leticia Brédice as the film’s true star.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
18 July 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
45*

The critic finds the film energetic and intriguing, but says its cleverness eventually becomes convoluted and feels like a cheat. The layered deception is singled out as the source of its intrigue, though the characters’ early scams are not especially enthralling.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate