Nosferatu (1922)

Jones calls the film the most frightening incarnation of the vampire count in horror history. He praises Max Schreck’s mesmerising performance and the tension sustained by Murnau’s silent imagery.

The critic calls the film a silent masterpiece and one of cinema’s preeminent firsts. He especially praises Murnau’s striking visual imagery and Max Schreck’s performance and makeup.

The critic calls the film ground zero for horror cinema. The available description singles out its place in the birth of the genre, while noting its loose adaptation of Dracula.

Newman gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it essential and the greatest screen Dracula. He singles out Max Schreck’s nightmarish performance as the vampire, while noting a few unwise directorial choices.

The critic calls the film exceptionally chilling and more bewitching than other adaptations of Stoker’s story. They single out Max Schreck’s unnerving performance and Murnau’s striking use of space and composition.

The review is clearly positive about the film’s direction and visual craft. It singles out the imaginative cinematography and Max Schreck’s effective pantomime performance.

The page appears to be a Great Movies review, but its text is inaccessible. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Shedwick finds the century-old film still terrifying and a cornerstone of horror, despite some dated qualities. She especially praises Max Schreck’s nightmarish Count Orlok and the film’s haunting visual presentation.

The critic presents Nosferatu as a timeless horror milestone whose plague themes feel newly resonant. They single out the film’s color tinting and Max Schreck’s performance for their lingering, unsettling effect.

The review is positive, arguing that the film’s strengths outweigh its awkward moments. It singles out Max Schreck’s compelling performance and Murnau’s blend of naturalistic and expressionistic elements for praise.