Critics’ reviews

Oklahoma! (1955)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 65: 4 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Oklahoma!

65
Positive
4
Mixed
3
Negative
1

The reviews lean favourable, with praise clustering around the songs and Agnes de Mille’s choreography rather than the performances as a whole. Admirers value the film’s preservation of the stage musical’s appeal, while the opening location photography also draws praise. The songs earn credit for expressing sexual yearning and pride naturally, and for belonging to the drama rather than merely interrupting it.

Reservations range from a soft-centred story and uneven acting to objections to the scale of the presentation, making this a fairly wide spread of opinion. Empire finds most performances underwhelming but singles out Gloria Grahame’s Ado Annie as an exception. The New Yorker is the clearest dissenter, finding the film pompous and objecting to oversized close-ups and deafening sound, though it praises Charlotte Greenwood. Even that negative review finds some charm in the songs and dances, the elements on which the consensus is strongest.

Variety
31 December 1954 · Variety Staff
85*

Variety finds the film a lively, successful capture of the stage musical’s magic. It singles out Agnes De Mille’s choreography as the production’s greatest strength.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tony Sloman
80

Sloman praises this rousing adaptation for preserving the musical’s songs and Agnes de Mille’s choreography. He especially singles out the striking location photography in the opening sequence.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 July 2006 · Patrick Peters
70*

The review finds the film flawed but ultimately a classic, praising its outstanding score and nostalgic appeal. It singles out Gloria Grahame’s Ado Annie as the exception to otherwise underwhelming performances.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 November 2005 · Noel Murray
70*

Murray regards Oklahoma! as a classic with an enduring, primal love triangle, though he calls it a soft-centered trifle. He praises its songs for making sexual yearning and pride feel natural.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 August 2006 · Wally Hammond
65*

The available text does not reveal the critic's overall verdict. It notes that the songs were already treasured standards and had been integrated into the dramatic narrative.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. Any praise or complaint is unavailable from the provided text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 October 1955 · Bosley Crowther
55*

The review gives the film a mildly favorable, qualified verdict. It singles out the musical’s presentation in the new Todd-AO process.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
14 October 1955 · John McCarten
30*

McCarten finds the film pompous and its presentation excessive, though he sees some noisy charm in its songs and dances. He singles out Charlotte Greenwood’s performance for praise, while criticizing the oversized closeups and deafening sound.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate