Critics’ reviews

Oldboy (2003)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 78: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Oldboy

78
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics respond strongly to Oldboy’s violent revenge story, with praise clustering around its restless imagery, immersive action and capacity to make brutality uncomfortable rather than merely exciting. The reviews repeatedly find more than technical skill in its setpieces: they see a troubling examination of hatred, responsibility and the value of vengeance. Its grotesque imagery and intricate mystery are central to that appeal, while Empire singles out the one-take corridor fight as a particular achievement.

The divide concerns how much substance sits beneath that visual confidence. Empire acknowledges implausibility but finds enough verve to recommend it to those with strong stomachs. The New York Times is the lone negative voice, enjoying the style while judging the mayhem largely empty and the narrative’s provocations juvenile. That leaves a wide spread of opinion, though six of the seven reviews favour the film: most find its violence purposeful; the dissent finds virtuosity insufficient.

Little White Lies
29 July 2019 · 5/5/4 · Kambole Campbell
100

The critic finds Oldboy a lurid, complex beast that has earned cult classic status despite not being Park's greatest work. They single out the film's thoughtful consideration of the violence it depicts, which makes the brutality increasingly unbearable and the final twists especially twisted.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 March 2005 · Carina Chocano
90*

The critic describes the film as an astonishingly visceral, dreamlike experience that plays like an extended adrenaline rush, hinging on a Byzantine narrative about the transformative power of hatred and revenge. She singles out its fluid, shifting torrent of imagery and unanswered questions about guilt, responsibility, and morality for praise, noting it feels truly authentic despite being weird and fantastical.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 October 2004 · Peter Bradshaw
90*

The critic finds Oldboy a gut-wrenchingly violent and queasily ingenious revenge thriller that opens up a new frontier of exotic horror in Korean cinema. They single out the protagonist's 15-year imprisonment and live-octopus-eating scene as particularly stomach-churning and memorable.

Read the full review →
Empire
15 October 2004 · William Thomas
75*

The critic finds Oldboy extreme in its violence, torture and revenge themes, with a standout one-take corridor fight scene, and advises viewers with strong stomachs to see it for its verve despite some implausibility.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 March 2005 · Manohla Dargis
30*

The critic calls it a good if trivial genre movie, entertaining to watch due to its visual style but with little substance beyond choreographed mayhem and a puerile twist ending. She singles out the director's unoriginal but snazzy visual style, indebted to Hitchcock, Kubrick, Buñuel, and especially David Fincher, for praise while complaining that cinematic virtuosity for its own sake threatens to bury viewers in shiny, meaningless movies.

Read the full review →
Polygon
17 August 2023 · Tasha Robinson
85*

The critic argues that Oldboy remains essential viewing for its immersive action, mystery, and visceral violence rather than just its historical influence. They single out the shocking, taboo-breaking ending and the way the film gets under the skin with its grotesque imagery.

Read the full review →
Consequence
16 August 2023 · Clint Worthington
80*

The critic highlights Oldboy's lasting impact on international cinema and its status as a raw, visceral revenge thriller that questions the value of vengeance. They single out its brutal setpieces and influence on later Korean cinema and global pop culture.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate