Critics’ reviews

Only Angels Have Wings (1939)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 85: 12 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Only Angels Have Wings

85
Positive
12
Mixed
1
Negative
0

The reviews lean strongly positive, with praise clustering around Howard Hawks’s direction, the ensemble and the feeling beneath the pilots’ professional stoicism. Critics repeatedly find the camaraderie convincing and the mixture of adventure, comedy and melancholy effective. Cary Grant and Jean Arthur attract particular attention for their performances and romantic chemistry. The aerial sequences provide excitement, while several reviews find just as much tension in the confined spaces where the characters work and gather.

The differences are mostly matters of enthusiasm rather than fundamental objections. Little White Lies finds the film less purely entertaining than some of Hawks’s other work, but especially moving. The Guardian is warmly appreciative without placing it among its favourite Hawks films. Empire supplies a more specific reservation, identifying Richard Barthelmess as the ensemble’s weak link. Across the available assessments, those qualifications sit within broad admiration for the film’s craft and emotional restraint.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tony Sloman
100

The critic gives the film a strongly positive assessment, calling it one of Howard Hawks's finest works. They single out the superb cast and the palpable tension created by the confined sets.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
2 October 2003 · ★★★★/4 · Zach Campbell
100

Campbell treats the film as a gorgeous masterwork that examines stoicism and grief within a professional group. He praises Hawks’s carefully composed spaces and the way their visual patterns express characters’ changing emotional states.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
9 April 2016 · Mike D'Angelo
90*

D'Angelo argues that the film is a strong contender for Hollywood's greatest and praises its unusual blend of pragmatism and deep feeling. He especially singles out how the final scene makes an emotionally restrained romantic gesture achingly moving.

Read the full review →
The Independent
14 May 2015 · Geoffrey Macnab
90*

Macnab warmly praises this re-release as a quintessential Howard Hawks film. He singles out its spectacular aerial sequences and the pilots’ fatalistic machismo.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
90*

The capsule presents the film as a stirring, highly effective workplace drama. It especially praises Cary Grant and Jean Arthur’s chemistry, while also highlighting the supporting ensemble.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
· Adam Cook
85*

Cook praises the film as Hawks’ most moving work, despite finding it less purely entertaining than some of his other films. He singles out its vivid camaraderie and melancholy portrayal of life among daredevil pilots.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1938 · Variety Staff
85*

The critic praises the film as an inspiringly well-told story. They single out Jean Arthur’s performance and the high standard of Grant and Arthur’s cynical romanticism.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
80*

The piece regards the film as one of Howard Hawks’s most enjoyable explorations of his recurring themes. It singles out Jean Arthur’s spirited performance and Rita Hayworth’s striking early role.

Read the full review →
Time Out
10 May 2015 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The available description presents the film favorably as a punchy classic. It highlights the glittering restoration as a reason to revisit it.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
78*

The critic finds the film a thrilling, humane adventure that turns familiar material into a compelling study of courage. They particularly praise Hawks’s direction and the ensemble, while singling out Richard Barthelmess’s performance as the weak link.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 May 2015 · Peter Bradshaw
75*

Bradshaw finds the film entertaining and very likable, though it is not his favourite Hawks picture. He praises its garrulous, effervescent blend of drama, intrigue, laughter and thrills.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 May 1939
65*

The page is identified as a review of the film, but its text is unavailable. No critical verdict or specific praise or complaint can be verified.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
14 May 2015 · Luke Shaw
90*

Shaw gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it a brilliant blend of plotting, drama, comedy and action. He particularly praises the sharp dialogue and charismatic performances, especially Cary Grant’s.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate