The reviews split almost down the middle, with a slight tilt towards the favourable. Nearly everyone agrees on John Boyega, whose charm and humour are credited with keeping the film watchable, and a good number of British critics find the sequel an improvement on the original, with a more coherent plot and better-paced action. The giant-robot spectacle is generally judged to deliver what fans want, and several describe it as unpretentious, likeable nonsense.
The reservations cluster around what has gone with del Toro: the visual poetry and the eccentric design. Many find the fights repetitive and the characters interchangeable, and the harsher notices call it formulaic, committee-built and cynical. The spread is wide. IndieWire gives it a B+ while The Wrap finds no fun in it at all, and The Telegraph goes further than most, calling it cheap-looking and muddled. Slant Magazine is the odd one out, arguing it is stranger and less predictable than the original.
I
IndieWire
20 March 2018 · B+ · David Ehrlich
83
This bland sequel is only a minor improvement on the original; it corrects some mistakes while highlighting eccentric charms but remains largely unremarkable.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
22 March 2018 · 3/4/3 · Hannah Strong
80
Boyega's natural charisma keeps the film watchable despite the absence of del Toro. It offers solid, scrappy fun with giant robot action but lacks the poetry and soul of the predecessor.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
21 March 2018 · ★★★/4
75
Steven S. DeKnight’s sequel lacks del Toro’s visual acumen but makes up for it with energetic chaos and hedges closer to nightmarish intensity; it is a more fascinating and unpredictable creation than its predecessor.
Read the full review →E
Empire
20 March 2018 · Helen O'Hara
70*
Uprising offers more gonzo invention and giddy destruction than the original, with DeKnight twisting the franchise in surprising directions. The action delivers spectacular property damage and thrills beyond recent Transformers films, though it rushes through character beats.
Read the full review →S
Sight and Sound
23 March 2018 · Kim Newman
70*
The critic finds the sequel lightly likeable and an improvement over the original thanks to more coherent plotting and human characterisation. John Boyega's charismatic lead performance is singled out for praise.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
20 March 2018
70*
The sequel improves on the original thanks to John Boyega’s charisma and a more cohesive plot with better-paced action scenes. It has a goofy likability and slick entertainment value despite a thin story.
Read the full review →I
The Independent
21 March 2018
70*
The film delivers noisy, brash crash-bang-wallop entertainment that becomes pleasurable once viewers adjust to the decibel level and destruction. Boyega brings likeable heroism and humour as the lead, giving the project a tongue-in-cheek quality absent from similar blockbusters.
Read the full review →N
The New York Times
21 March 2018 · Critic’s Pick · Glenn Kenny
70*
The critic finds the sequel adroit and enjoyable as giant-robot sci-fi action, with better-than-average sequences and amiable humor. He singles out its ability to hit a nostalgic Godzilla sweet spot.
Read the full review →T
The Times
23 March 2018 · ★★★☆☆ · Kevin Maher
70*
An unpretentious, workmanlike and bone-headed sequel that is better than the first film, led by John Boyega’s skittish charisma. It is set mostly in China and proudly unpretentious.
Read the full review →Boyega adds real bounce to proceedings while DeKnight delivers the expected giant-robot spectacle. The sequel provides the fun, larger-than-life kaiju action fans expect.
Read the full review →The film is dumb and formulaic but still zesty enough to carry through its set pieces, with a cynical market-driven approach that includes substantial Chinese elements and thrilling moments in the suits.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
5.6/10 · Alan Jones
56
The film is a disjointed sequel with repetitive monster mayhem that makes little sense. It delivers expected city-smashing action and punches above its weight as mindless junk entertainment.
Read the full review →V
Variety
20 March 2018 · Nick Schager
45*
The critic finds it a cartoony, unremarkable robot-monster spectacle that ditches the original’s distinctive elements for a Transformers-like approach lacking heft and imagination. He singles out the paint-by-numbers franchise construction and formulaic future installments.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
22 March 2018 · Justin Chang
40*
The critic calls it a bland, efficient, cheerfully witless sequel that is dumber and slighter than the original but more endurable. He notes the clunky noisy action and rock-’em-sock-’em appeal while admitting it is not really for him.
Read the full review →A
The AV Club
22 March 2018 · Baraka Kaseko, A.A. Dowd, Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
40*
The follow-up contains little of the geeky enthusiasm of the original; it is an impersonal and sometimes tedious sequel that proves it is possible to screw up giant robots punching giant monsters.
Read the full review →T
The Telegraph
22 March 2018 · ★★ · Robbie Collin
40
The film is atrocious and cheap-looking with muddled plotting that denies stars like Boyega space to shine. It tramples the original’s premise and feels like a committee-written cash-in with flat visuals.
Read the full review →F
Financial Times
21 March 2018 · ★★☆☆☆ · Nigel Andrews
30*
A parlously plotted sci-fi sequel that is the first cuckoo of spring, relying on special effects, music and hummable one-liners from John Boyega while planting a weak plot. It is brainless pop-tech apocalypse spectacle.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
20 March 2018
30*
The sequel shifts focus to grand-scale fights between Jaegers and Kaijus with some fun from returning comic characters. Battles feel less poetic than the original, with daylight clarity highlighting the action but also its sameness.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
20 March 2018 · Frank Scheck
30*
The sequel brings nothing new to the franchise except repetition and becomes tiresome in its cliched plotting and repetitive action sequences. It is strictly for those who left the original wanting more.
Read the full review →P
Polygon
21 March 2018 · Susana Polo
70*
The critic calls it surprisingly enjoyable nonsense that delivers fun robot-vs-monster action and commits fully to its mythology if you liked the first film, but notes weaker logic, character work, design, and scale.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
23 March 2018 · ★★★ · Don Kaye
60
The critic finds it fast-moving and moderately entertaining with impressive action sequences, but criticizes it for being a generic remix with interchangeable characters, unmemorable robots and monsters, and a sense that it evaporates after viewing.
Read the full review →/
/Film
23 March 2018 · 6/10 · Karen Han
60
The first half is weighed down by heavy exposition and broadly sketched characters, but the second half becomes a joyful, cartoonish romp with coherent, colorful action sequences. Boyega's charm and the eccentric returning characters provide highlights amid the absurdity.
Read the full review →H
HeyUGuys
21 March 2018 · ★★★ · Zehra Phelan
60
The film delivers the same bombastic robot-vs-monster action as the first but with more teenage angst, muddled plotting, and a lack of invention, making it forgettable overall. Boyega's effortless charm and wit give it a slight edge and elevate the material.
Read the full review →C
Collider
21 March 2018 · C · Matt Goldberg
57
The critic praises John Boyega's charismatic lead performance and the film's serviceable giant robot action but faults it for lacking the original's energy, design, world-building, and personality, calling it a pale imitation.
Read the full review →N
NME
24 March 2018 · ★★ · Alex Flood
40
The critic calls it an aggressively commercial bore-fest that risks tarnishing the original's memory, with too many shallow characters, a bloated runtime, and repetitive action scenes that grow boring despite some clever twists.
Read the full review →The critic finds the sequel scatterbrained and exhausting, losing the original's geeky exhilaration and failing at coherent storytelling and fight choreography, though John Boyega's charm provides occasional bright spots.
Read the full review →W
The Wrap
20 March 2018 · Dan Callahan
20*
The critic finds the sequel formulaic and cynical, with no fun or emotional pull. They single out the lack of stakes and the uninteresting monsters and robots as the main complaint.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate