Critics’ reviews

Pandora's Box (1929)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 82: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Pandora's Box

82
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics treat Pandora’s Box as a classic, and the reviews are close to unanimous. Nearly every one comes back to Louise Brooks as Lulu: expressive, commanding, and the main reason the film still holds. Pabst’s direction gets almost as much credit, in particular the close-ups, the fluid camera and the lighting, which several critics describe as unusually modern for 1929. The film’s erotic charge and its moral unease come up repeatedly, as does the final sequence.

The spread is narrow and there is no outright dissent. The one clear reservation comes from Empire, which finds the restored, uncut version slow in places while still calling it bold and compelling. A few of the later reviews, written around reissues, spend as much time on the restoration’s contrast and sharpness as on the film itself, which suggests critics now take its standing as settled and are arguing about the print.

Little White Lies
31 May 2018 · 5/5/5 · Caroline Golum
100

The critic says the reissue reaffirms the film’s classic status. She particularly praises Louise Brooks’s iconic performance and Pabst’s intimate close-ups.

Read the full review →
Time Out
5 December 2006 · Wally Hammond
90*

Hammond presents Pabst’s film as an extraordinary, tragic masterpiece. He singles out its erotic force and its adaptation of two works.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 October 1993 · Mark Chalon Smith
85*

Smith regards the film as a subtle, impressively crafted silent classic. He especially praises Louise Brooks’s vivid, captivating performance and the film’s striking final sequence.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
85*

The critic praises the film as a classic, highlighting Louise Brooks’s captivating performance as Lulu. They also single out Pabst’s meticulous direction and the fluid camera work and expressive lighting.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 October 2024 · ★★★★ · Ed Gonzalez
80

Gonzalez praises the film as a modern, morally unsettling masterpiece. He singles out its visionary chiaroscuro and the Criterion transfer’s improved contrast and sharpness.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
20 May 2007 · Philip French
80*

French regards Pandora’s Box as the better of two great silent films. He praises Brooks’s expressive performance and the films’ subtle, fluent maturity.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 June 2006 · David Parkinson
70*

Parkinson finds the restored, uncut film bold and compelling despite occasional slowness. He especially praises Louise Brooks’s captivating performance and Pabst’s technically accomplished visual style.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 July 2003
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praise or complaint can be verified from the accessible text.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 May 2018 · Jennie Kermode
90*

Kermode considers the film a highly accomplished classic that still stands out among its era’s treasures. She especially praises Louise Brooks’s commanding performance and Pabst’s striking visual style.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate